Processed: Re: openoffice.org: impress displays bold font as too bold

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 573622 patch fixed-upstream Bug #573622 [openoffice.org] openoffice.org: impress displays bold font as too bold Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 573622:

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-writer: oowriter crashes when opening a .docx file

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 550359 1:3.2.1-6 Bug #550359 [openoffice.org-writer] openoffice.org-writer: oowriter crashes when opening a .docx file Bug Marked as found in versions openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-6. > tags 550359 + upstream Bug #550359 [openoffice.org-writer] op

Processed: Re: openoffice.org: Recovery dialog too tall, the buttons are out of reach

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 531930 + pending Bug #531930 [openoffice.org] openoffice.org: Recovery dialog too tall, the buttons are out of reach Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 531930: http://bugs.d

Re: openoffice.org -headless in backports?

Hi, On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:31:48AM -0600, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: > I wanted to upgrade to the latest version of oo to see if the problem > is still there, I see a oo 3.1.1 in backports but I can't find > headless package in backports. > > Is openoffice.org-headless available in backports for

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-base: Java crash navigating Base document

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 553572 openjdk-6-jre Bug #553572 [openoffice.org-base] openoffice.org-base: Java crash navigating Base document Bug reassigned from package 'openoffice.org-base' to 'openjdk-6-jre'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions openoffice.or

Re: OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

On 16.08.2009 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: * Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit flaky? The next two years f

Re: OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

Hi, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 03:15:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should > > those > > happen? Can we do something to make them easier? > > I am not aware of any, but you never know with Sun. (The last one was with > OOo

Re: OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

Hi, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > * Which major upstream releases of OO.org are expected in the next two > years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit > flaky? The next two years from now? OOo 3.2.0 (planned End of Noiv. 2

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-voikko give-backs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 529020 Bug#529020: expects $HOME writable, doesn't speciffy correct -L to ../sdk/lib in settings.mk 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-voikko give-backs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 529020 expects $HOME writable, doesn't speciffy correct -L to > ../sdk/lib in settings.mk Bug#529020: openoffice.org-voikko: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -luno_sal Changed Bug title to `expects $HOME writable, doesn't speciffy correct -L to ..

Re: OpenOffice.org hangs on start up

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 17:11, Mr. Wang Long wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 16:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Do you use some input method? >> >> Can it be you ran into the known X bug? >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511178 + the ones merged >> with it >> http://bugs.debian

Re: OpenOffice.org hangs on start up

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 16:45, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Mr. Wang Long wrote: >> After a recently upgrade, OOo in sid (amd64, version 1:3.0.1-4+b1, >> with Gnome) no longer works anymore. It just stops while showing OOo's >> splash screen, with CPU usage 0% and no output at all on command lin

Re: OpenOffice.org hangs on start up

Hi, Mr. Wang Long wrote: > After a recently upgrade, OOo in sid (amd64, version 1:3.0.1-4+b1, > with Gnome) no longer works anymore. It just stops while showing OOo's > splash screen, with CPU usage 0% and no output at all on command line. Did it work before with other 3.0.x? > Any ideas? Thanks

Re: OpenOffice.org hangs on start up

Mr. Wang Long wrote: Dear all, After a recently upgrade, OOo in sid (amd64, version 1:3.0.1-4+b1, with Gnome) no longer works anymore. It just stops while showing OOo's splash screen, with CPU usage 0% and no output at all on command line. Indeed it is difficult to locate the problem, because I

Re: OpenOffice.org hangs on start up

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 19:10, Mr. Wang Long wrote: > Dear all, > > After a recently upgrade, OOo in sid (amd64, version 1:3.0.1-4+b1, > with Gnome) no longer works anymore. It just stops while showing OOo's > splash screen, with CPU usage 0% and no output at all on command line. > > Indeed it is d

Re: openoffice.org built against experimentals icu

Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Jay Berkenbilt wrote: >> > Just FYI, the reason I have not upload icu 4.0 (or 4.0.1, which has >> > just been released) to sid is that 4.2 is expected out soon. I don't >> > believe the transition to icu 4.0 would finish before 4.2 is out,

Re: openoffice.org built against experimentals icu

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > Just FYI, the reason I have not upload icu 4.0 (or 4.0.1, which has > > > just been released) to sid is that 4.2 is expected out soon. I don't > > > believe the transition to icu 4.0 would finish before 4.2 is out,

Re: openoffice.org built against experimentals icu

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > Just FYI, the reason I have not upload icu 4.0 (or 4.0.1, which has > > just been released) to sid is that 4.2 is expected out soon. I don't > > believe the transition to icu 4.0 would finish before 4.2 is out, so, > > after discussing with up

Re: openoffice.org built against experimentals icu

Hi, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Just FYI, the reason I have not upload icu 4.0 (or 4.0.1, which has > just been released) to sid is that 4.2 is expected out soon. I don't > believe the transition to icu 4.0 would finish before 4.2 is out, so, > after discussing with upstream, I have decided to wait f

Re: openoffice.org built against experimentals icu

Just FYI, the reason I have not upload icu 4.0 (or 4.0.1, which has just been released) to sid is that 4.2 is expected out soon. I don't believe the transition to icu 4.0 would finish before 4.2 is out, so, after discussing with upstream, I have decided to wait for 4.2. I will be uploading the f

Processed: Re: Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 504323 gcc-snapshot Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup with gcc 4.4 libs Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-core' to `gcc-snapshot'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

reassign 504323 gcc-snapshot thanks Matthias Klose wrote: > forwarded 504323 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38732 > thanks > > Stephan, please could you subscribe to the report mentioned above? OK, as it seems to be a gcc bug, reassigning to gcc. Reassign back if it's decided that OOo should be fixed. Gr

Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

forwarded 504323 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38732 thanks Stephan, please could you subscribe to the report mentioned above? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 504323 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38732 Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup with gcc 4.4 libs Forwarded-to-address changed from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97697 to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38732.

Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Reproducing with libstdc++.so.6 and libgcc_s.so.1 from gcc-4.4-20090102 in unxlngi6.pro DEV300m38 OOo, the problem is that OOo at l. 52 assumes a layout of struct __cxa_exception as given i

Processed: Re: Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfixed 504323 1:3.0.1~rc1-2 Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup with gcc 4.4 libs Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 1:3.0.1~rc1-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Re: Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

notfixed 504323 1:3.0.1~rc1-2 thanks Rene Engelhard wrote: > BTW; it works for me with 3.0.1 on amd64... Florian, can you confirm? No, sorry, no idea why it worked before I wrote this, but it actually doesn't... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :'

Processed: Re: Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 504323 1:2.4.1-7 Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup with gcc 4.4 libs Bug marked as found in version 1:2.4.1-7. > close 504323 1:3.0.1~rc1-2 Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup with gcc

Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

found 504323 1:2.4.1-7 close 504323 1:3.0.1~rc1-2 thanks Hi, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: > seems to be an incompatibility of libgcc_s . Could you provide the > memory map of the process and may be some debug info for the bridge as > well? If you tell me/Florian how to do it/what

Bug#504323: [udk-dev] Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Hi Rene, seems to be an incompatibility of libgcc_s . Could you provide the memory map of the process and may be some debug info for the bridge as well? Thanks Kay Rene Engelhard wrote: tag 504323 - moreinfo tag 504323 - unreproducible retitle 504323 openoffice.org-core: Segmentation

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 504323 - moreinfo Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > tag 504323 - unreproducible Bug#504323: openoffice.org-core: Segmentation fault at startup Tags were:

Re: openoffice.org-base 2.4.1 in lenny : no support for LDAP

Hi, Mickael GARNIER wrote: > I installed openoffice 2.4.1-12 on lenny via apt-get and I notice that > openoffice.org-base has no support for LDAP database (wizard -> connect > to existing database). > In the 2.3 version I used previously (downloaded from ooo.org), the ldap > support was incl

Re: openoffice.org-sdbc-postgresql package in Lenny recommends postgresql

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Simon Waters wrote: > > I believe this relationship is too strong. > > Redardless of what I think of cour suggestion I believe the whole > "install-recommends-per-default" thing is bogus. > > > I would suggest most OpenOffice base users shouldn't have a postgres > >

Re: openoffice.org-sdbc-postgresql package in Lenny recommends postgresql

Hi, Simon Waters wrote: > I believe this relationship is too strong. Redardless of what I think of cour suggestion I believe the whole "install-recommends-per-default" thing is bogus. > I would suggest most OpenOffice base users shouldn't have a postgres database > installed locally, and thus t

Processed: Re: openoffice.org: Use of inches/millimeter.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 408738 1:2.3.1-5 Bug#408738: openoffice.org: Use of inches/millimeter. Bug marked as found in version 1:2.3.1-5. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.2.1 stuck in unstable

Hi, John Talbut wrote: > 2.2.1 seems to be stuck in unstable. [...] Yes :/. > [...] Anyone know what is happening and What's happeding: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=openoffice.org Basically it's held up by sparc/glibc borkage (the sparc buildds have real problems), missing a

Processed: Re: Openoffice.org amd64 bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 397506 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74814 Bug#397506: OpenOffice 2.0.4 (AMD64) dBASE table read not working Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74814. > clo

Bug#381369: Bug#379804: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels]

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote: I just tried that again, and File -> Export as PDF showed all string here (2.0.4.dfsg.1-1/ppc) Maybe this is due to a fixed en-GB GSI merged in by us (but 2.0.3-4 also has a en-GB GSI merged in, but maybe it got changed later) I just retried and

Processed: Re: Bug#379804: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 379804 + moreinfo Bug#379804: openoffice.org: In locale en_GB.UTF-8, several strings in the export dialog are missing There were no tags set. Bug#381369: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels Tags added: moreinfo > tag 379804 +

Bug#381369: Bug#379804: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels]

tag 379804 + moreinfo tag 379804 + unreproducible thanks Hi, > > chose "Export as PDF", after chosing a filename, the dialog is presented > > without may of the text labels making it nearly impossible to work with. > > If I just hit the blank "OK" button, it appears to work fine, so I > > im

Bug#379804: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels]

hu, 14 Dec 2006 12:01:17 +0100 From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ryan Hayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruno Harbulot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11

Processed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 379804 important Bug#379804: openoffice.org: In locale en_GB.UTF-8, several strings in the export dialog are missing Severity set to `important' from `normal' > reassign 379804 openoffice.org-l10n-en-gb,openoffice.org-l10n-en-za Bug#379804: o

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 381369 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66919 Bug#381369: openoffice.org: Export as PDF dialog missing text labels Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66919. >

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-help-es: localization of help and OOo differ

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 258841 important Bug#258841: openoffice.org-help-es: please depend on -l10n-es Severity set to `important' from `wishlist' > retitle 258841 openoffice.org-help-es: needs to depend on -l10n-es Bug#258841: openoffice.org-help-es: please depend o

RE: Openoffice.org-dev regomp

Thanx Very much ... I will forward this onto the Edgy Ooo maintanters. -Original Message- From: Rene Engelhard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 October 2006 11:19 To: CLAIRE, Narinder, Group Risk Mgmt Cc: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Openoffice.org-dev regomp Hi

Re: Openoffice.org-dev regomp

Hi, Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2006 11:00 schrieb CLAIRE, Narinder, Group Risk Mgmt: > I am not sure whether this is the correct place to post this, if not please > let me know for future reference. it is. Although a bugreport also would have helped; although not now since it already is fixed. (and

Re: OpenOffice.org Localized build.

Le mardi 24 janvier 2006 à 16:51 +0530, priti Patil a écrit : > Hi Jérôme, > > Thanks for quick reply. Please, unless it is confidential, really personal, or wouldn't care to anybody else, try to answer to the mailing-list. Thanks > On 1/24/06, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: OpenOffice.org Localized build.

Le mardi 24 janvier 2006 à 11:32 +0530, priti Patil a écrit : > Hi list, > > How one should decide on what debian distribution (sid, stable, > unstable etc) should be used for building OpenOffice.org source ? So > that minimum or no issue should come across at all. Official Debian packages are alw

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:08:32 +0900 YABUKI Yukiharu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In My Option: > When we use gcc 4.0.1 or later, we will evaluate 'cws-i18nshrink.diff' and > 'buildfix-gcc41-friend-decl-i18npool.diff' again. I mistake. I mean that fix '-fvisibity=hidden' version. I used gcc : [EM

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:29:56 +0100 Martin Kretzschmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just disable the gcc41 patches. Shouldn't be a problem because you're > using gcc 4.0 > > HTH, Thank you. > Hope this Helps I can rebuild. And I re-check libdict_ja.so. It is also fine. It is better way to fix

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

On 1/16/06, YABUKI Yukiharu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I try to rebuild, Thanks > but ... It is seems to have patch dependency : cws-i18nshrink.diff > > cws-i18nshrink.diff and buildfix-gcc41-friend-decl-i18npool.diff manipulate > i18npool/inc/localedata.hxx > > Hummm Do I need to make pat

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

Hi I try to rebuild, but ... It is seems to have patch dependency : cws-i18nshrink.diff cws-i18nshrink.diff and buildfix-gcc41-friend-decl-i18npool.diff manipulate i18npool/inc/localedata.hxx Hummm Do I need to make patch for buildfix-gcc41-friend-decl-i18npool.diff ? Do someone have sma

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

Hi On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:38:37 +0100 Martin Kretzschmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please do not use g++(4.0) option which is "-fvisibility=hidden". > > This will of cause lead to performance regressions... Yes, that is ture. > > > See also: > > http://bugs.debian.org/307207 > > [PR 2258

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

Hi, On 1/10/06, YABUKI Yukiharu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found a crash issue OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 in experimental. > > Please do not use g++(4.0) option which is "-fvisibility=hidden". This will of cause lead to performance regressions... > See also: > http://bugs.debian.org/307207 > [PR 2

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

Hi, Am Donnerstag 12 Januar 2006 04:00 schrieb YABUKI Yukiharu: [ patch instructions snipped ] thanks, but I do know how to do these patches, thanks... > > Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hmm. So far I thought that problem only matters when building against > > > libstdc++ instea

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

Hi, Rene please check attach patch I made patch in ($top)/openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/build/ooa680-m1/config_office/ On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:02:28 +0100 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm. So far I thought that problem only matters when building against > libstdc++ instead of

Re: OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 (Experimantal) issue with -fvisibility=hidden

Hi, Am Dienstag 10 Januar 2006 08:50 schrieb YABUKI Yukiharu: > Please do not use g++(4.0) option which is "-fvisibility=hidden". > See also: > http://bugs.debian.org/307207 > [PR 22587] shared libraries built with -fvisibility=hidden segfaults > > > When Japanse envirionment, Sometime Openoffice.

Re: openoffice.org-l10n-ar: Package installable...but does nothing

Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: openoffice.org-l10n-ar > Version: 1.1.3-9 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > This package, as well as all -l10n-* packages built for 1.1 versions are > actually mostly useless. They currently conflict with "open

Re: openoffice.org build hanging on sparc

Hi, Blars Blarson wrote: > openoffice.org failed to build on a sparc buildd due to an unavailable > build depency. it did? how? (FWIW, the buildd pages still say "Building"..) > The build on my sparc pbuilder is using no cpu time and has not changed > the log file in almost 8 hours. The end of

Re: openoffice.org sparc build needs requeued

Hi, Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 23:58 schrieb Blars Blarson: > openoffice.org failed to build on a sparc buildd due to temporarily > unavailable build dependancies. It has built on my sparc pbuilder. It's unfortunately not temporary. unixodbc-dev simply is not installable in sid at the moment

Re: openoffice.org-gtk-gnome and SCIM

Hello, Martin! Thank you for your time. Did you try with a Japanese locale? My scim installation is broken at the moment, can't test. I didn't yet. I will let you know if I do. Maybe setting GTK_IM_MODULE=scim helps. But I doubt that. I doubt it too. It is already set. :-) If I uninst

Re: openoffice.org-gtk-gnome and SCIM

Hi Andre, Andre Caldas schrieb: > When I install the package openoffice.org-gtk-gnome the SCIM input > method does not work. > > I am using debian testing. GNOME, of course. :-) > Also, my locales are set to en_US.UTF-8. I was trying to input in Japanese. Did you try with a Japanese locale? My s

Re: OpenOffice.org

On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:20 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't read much about OpenOffice.org Version 2. Any idea of when > it will hit Sid? Well, it's got to be released first! ;) Check the list archives for the location of beta debs. --

Re: openoffice.org sparc build needs requeued with longer timeout

hi, Blars Blarson wrote: > openoffice.org failed to build on a sparc buildd due to an inactivity > timeout. It has built on my sparc pbuilder. > > > register uno component: > /build/buildd/openoffice.org-1.1.3/debian/tmp//usr/lib/openoffice/program/pythonloader.uno.so > register configuration:

Re: OpenOffice.org Linux/ARM port

Hello,   I used the tar.gz from here http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/test/arm/ to install OpenOffice on my Sharp Zaurus SL-C860, running pdaXrom and a debian chroot. I managed to install it, after installing the required libs. (could not use the deb-packages, this always gave m

Re: openoffice.org-1.1.3

Thank you very much for your file, Chris. It works now. Emily On Dec 14, 2004 03:29 PM, Emily Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Chris, > > I tried to compile OO with java enabled and got the following errors: > > Making : Dependencies > touch ../../unxlngi4.pro/misc/helper.dpc > ---

Re: openoffice.org-1.1.3

On Tuesday 14 December 2004 23:29 pm, Emily Dai wrote: > I knew that you have a fix for this. But since I can't get this patch > from cvs, could you please send it to me? Hi, please help yourself to CVS. The module is ooo-bulid in gnome cvs. This is probably the one you need: http://cvs.gnome.

Processed: Re: openoffice.org: crashes during startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 272712 Bug#272712: openoffice.org: crashes during startup Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Re: OpenOffice.org Linux/ARM port

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:38 +, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wow. OpenOffice on ARM. I am staring at my screen in disbelief and > > awe... Congratulations, I'm glad you pulled it off! > > Thanks ;-) > > B

Re: OpenOffice.org Linux/ARM port

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow. OpenOffice on ARM. I am staring at my screen in disbelief and > awe... Congratulations, I'm glad you pulled it off! Thanks ;-) But you shoud probably thank Psion for funding the development to make it

Re: OpenOffice.org Linux/ARM port

Wow. OpenOffice on ARM. I am staring at my screen in disbelief and awe... Congratulations, I'm glad you pulled it off! On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 06:52, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 13:51 schrieben Sie: > > I built and ran them on debussy and the basic stuff I test

Re: OpenOffice.org Linux/ARM port

On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 13:51 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > $SUBJECT seems to be complete for 1.1.x and will probably go into upstream > CVS > soon. I built a "normal" installset and debs based on the current Debian CVS > for 1.1.3 (you'll need the binary-indep stuff from experimental).

Re: OpenOffice.org Linux/ARM port

Hi, Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 13:51 schrieben Sie: > I built and ran them on debussy and the basic stuff I tested worked fine, > but I was behind a slow X forwarding so I didn't test much... > > Happy testing :-) Hrmpf. Sent it too fast: http://people.debian.org/~rene/openoffice.org/test/a

Re: openoffice.org override disparity

Hi, Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2004 20:04 schrieben Sie: > openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.2dfsg1-2_all.deb: package says section is kde, > override says editors. I once wrote a mail wrt that but it apparently got lost. -mimelnk contains mimelnks for KDE, so the Section: probably should be KDE. Woul

Processed: Re: openoffice.org-l10n-he: tabs in dialog boxes are displayed badly, making them unreadable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 273783 + moreinfo Bug#273783: openoffice.org-l10n-he: tabs in dialog boxes are displayed badly, making them unreadable Tags were: l10n Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Processed: Re: openoffice.org: .desktop files needs MimeType entry

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 272638 + patch Bug#272638: openoffice.org: .desktop files needs MimeType entry Tags were: pending experimental Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:10:41PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:33, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 21. September 2004 12:28 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > Why not? If all of OOo is LGPL, then the license allows you to > > > distribute under the terms of the GPL, so l

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

Rene Engelhard wrote: > Josh Triplett wrote: >>I think the ideal solution would be to change hspell so that it can >>build outside of the OO.o source tree; as far as I know, it is OK to >>have some GPLed and some non-free plugins for the same LGPLed program, >>as long as they are not all distribute

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

Hi, Josh Triplett wrote: > I think the ideal solution would be to change hspell so that it can > build outside of the OO.o source tree; as far as I know, it is OK to > have some GPLed and some non-free plugins for the same LGPLed program, > as long as they are not all distributed together. The hs

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

Chris Halls wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:33, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>Am Dienstag, 21. September 2004 12:28 schrieb Steve Langasek: >> >>>Why not? If all of OOo is LGPL, then the license allows you to >>>distribute under the terms of the GPL, so linking with another GPL >>>library is ok. >> >>

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:33, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Am Dienstag, 21. September 2004 12:28 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > Why not? If all of OOo is LGPL, then the license allows you to > > distribute under the terms of the GPL, so linking with another GPL > > library is ok. > > Hmm... Does this mea

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:28, Steve Langasek wrote: > What are the advantages of hspell (which I've never heard of) over other > spellchecking implementations already used by OOo, btw? The Hebrew language has a different form than English (or other latin based languages) and thus is better handled

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

Hi, Am Dienstag, 21. September 2004 12:28 schrieb Steve Langasek: > Why not? If all of OOo is LGPL, then the license allows you to > distribute under the terms of the GPL, so linking with another GPL > library is ok. Hmm... > What are the advantages of hspell (which I've never heard of) over ot

Re: OpenOffice.org (LGPL) and hspell (GPL)

On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:01:52PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > [ -legal: please let the CCs intact and CC: me, I am not subscribed ] > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=255451 contains a wish to > include hspell support (upstream issue > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug

Re: OpenOffice.org and fonts

Am Montag, 19. Juli 2004 11:39 schrieb Chris Halls: > Hi, Hi, thanks for your answer. Especially, the config file excerpt you posted was very useful. > On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 23:15, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > I use woody and the OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 packages from > > deb ftp://ftp.freenet.

Re: OpenOffice.org and fonts

Hi, On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 23:15, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > I use woody and the OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 packages from > deb ftp://ftp.freenet.de/pub/debian-openoffice stable-test main contrib. > I want to use fonts for screen display as well as printing. > > Do I have to install the respective fo

Re: OpenOffice.org AMD-64 debian

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Thibaut Fernagut wrote: > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > >Thibaut Fernagut wrote: > > I also have the SRC.RPM from Suse 9.1 AMD OOo 1.1.1 If you are > > interested I can put that somewhere on line . > > I looked on ftp.suse.com (/pub/suse/x86_64/9.1/suse/x86_x64) and t

Re: OpenOffice.org AMD-64 debian

Hi, Thibaut Fernagut wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > >Thibaut Fernagut wrote: > >>Fedora and Suse allready have a OOo 64 bit version , but debian-pure-64 > >>has not. I'm not smart enough to build one for debian , but here is the > >>srpm from fedora. > >> > >>Could somebody look at this and r

Re: OpenOffice.org AMD-64 debian

Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Thibaut Fernagut wrote: Fedora and Suse allready have a OOo 64 bit version , but debian-pure-64 has not. I'm not smart enough to build one for debian , but here is the srpm from fedora. Could somebody look at this and release a debian-package ? ftp://ftp.surfn

Re: OpenOffice.org AMD-64 debian

Hi, Thibaut Fernagut wrote: > Fedora and Suse allready have a OOo 64 bit version , but debian-pure-64 > has not. I'm not smart enough to build one for debian , but here is the > srpm from fedora. > > Could somebody look at this and release a debian-package ? > > ftp://ftp.surfnet.nl/pub/os/Li

Re: openoffice.org menubar displaying errors

Hi Christian, This is bug # 241529 -- the openoffice team seems to be having some trouble reproducing it. workaround (for most people -- doesn't work for me in xfce!) is to start OOo with: OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=none oowriter see if it works! g'luck, m On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 09:57:27AM +0200,

Bug#218833: [halls@debian.org: Re: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs)]

Oops. Here's the image. Scott -- Scott Thatcher Assistant Professor of Mathematics Truman State University [EMAIL PROTECTED] palladio.png Description: PNG image

Bug#218833: [halls@debian.org: Re: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs)]

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:34:40PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: > Hi Scott, > > I can't reproduce this bug anymore with openoffice.org 1.1.1-2. I tried > on 2 completely different machines. Do you still see this, or can I > close the report? > > Thanks, > Chris > Chris, It's partially fixed. A

Bug#218833: [halls@debian.org: Re: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs)]

Hi Scott, I can't reproduce this bug anymore with openoffice.org 1.1.1-2. I tried on 2 completely different machines. Do you still see this, or can I close the report? Thanks, Chris

Re: OpenOffice.org help files for Greek language

[ sorry for the late answer.. ] Hi, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > A Greek developer (Nikos Niktaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) has created > greek help files for OpenOffice.org. > Could these be included in the next version of OpenOffice.org? > Do you need a specific format for the files to be incl

Processed: Re: Bug#218833: [halls@debian.org: Re: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs)]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Downgrade severity since the main bug was already solved > severity 218833 normal Bug#218833: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs) Severity set to `normal'. > tags 218833 + moreinfo Bug#218833: openoffice.or

Bug#218833: [halls@debian.org: Re: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs)]

# Downgrade severity since the main bug was already solved severity 218833 normal tags 218833 + moreinfo thanks Hi Scott, On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 18:58, Scott Thatcher wrote: > Now my lingering problem. Paladio only shows up in italics in > OpenOffice on my unstable system. This problem is mirror

Re: openoffice.org override disparity

Hi, Debian Installer wrote: > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > openoffice.org-mimelnk_1.1.0-3_all.deb: package says section is kde, override > says editors. It is the MIME links for KDE, so I think Section: kde is

Bug#218833: [halls@debian.org: Re: openoffice.org: Type 1 fonts do not display correctly on-screen (all programs)]

Chris, Thanks for the fast and informative reply. I hadn't known that OpenOffice puts a printer icon next to fonts that it won't display on-screen. That explains a lot. The short version of my reply is that I wasn't having the problem I thought I was having, but I now have one lingering issue (

Re: openoffice.org v1.1.0 install failure

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:00:11PM -0700, Nathan Myers wrote: > I found that the latest release of openoffice.org wouldn't install > (or, once installed, run) with the version of debianutils-1.15 I had, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison debianutils debianutils | 1.16 |stable | source, a

  1   2   3   >