Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Martin Kretzschmar wrote: > > > Dan Korostelev wrote: > > > > > A license specific to Debian is not allowed. > > > > I'll ask him about OOO icons license. I guess it's LGPL, but I dunno > > > > exactly. > > > > 1) Most of

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Martin Kretzschmar wrote: > > Dan Korostelev wrote: > > > > A license specific to Debian is not allowed. > > > I'll ask him about OOO icons license. I guess it's LGPL, but I dunno > > > exactly. > > 1) Most of the icons you want are already in ooo-build/desktop, i.e. almost > trivially availa

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-07 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Hi, > Dan Korostelev wrote: > > > A license specific to Debian is not allowed. > > I'll ask him about OOO icons license. I guess it's LGPL, but I dunno > > exactly. 1) Most of the icons you want are already in ooo-build/desktop, i.e. almost trivially available to the packageing scripts. They jus

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Dan Korostelev wrote: > > A license specific to Debian is not allowed. > I'll ask him about OOO icons license. I guess it's LGPL, but I dunno > exactly. > > despite icons license, can you at least make ooo .desktop icons themeable by > applying 'sed' magic, you mentioned (removing absolute pa

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-06 Thread Josh Triplett
Rene Engelhard wrote: > Dan Korostelev wrote: >>You are free to use these icons in a GPLed project. Check the apropriate >>module for licensing (Some icons are even LGPLed and suitable for >>distribution along a proprietary application). > > err. I think we have a problem here. GPLed icons could n

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Korostelev
В сообщении от Втр, 2004-07-06 at 18:16 +0200, Rene Engelhard писал: > > You are free to use these icons in a GPLed project. Check the apropriate > > module for licensing (Some icons are even LGPLed and suitable for > > distribution along a proprietary application). > err. I think we have a proble

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Dan Korostelev wrote: > ?? ?? ??, 2004-07-06 at 16:10 +0200, Rene Engelhard > ??: > > > > beautiful icons (free, from Jimmac's jimmac.musichall.cz website). Place > > > icons in /usr/share/pixmaps. Please, include this in next OOO package > > > release. Thank

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Korostelev
В сообщении от Втр, 2004-07-06 at 16:10 +0200, Rene Engelhard писал: > > beautiful icons (free, from Jimmac's jimmac.musichall.cz website). Place > > icons in /usr/share/pixmaps. Please, include this in next OOO package > > release. Thanks! > What license are they under? Where are they supposed to

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Dan Korostelev wrote: > Tags: patch well, this is not really a patch because those desktop files are autogenerated and you did give the full .desktop files but anyhow :) > The current OOO's GNOME menu icons are very ugly-looking and is not > themeable. I attached the fixed .desktop files (I

Bug#257410: GNOME menu icons

2004-07-03 Thread Dan Korostelev
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.1-4 Severity: minor Tags: patch The current OOO's GNOME menu icons are very ugly-looking and is not themeable. I attached the fixed .desktop files (I only changed Icon entries to non-absolute paths and removed file extensions) and new, beautiful icons (free, fr