Hi, Martin Kretzschmar wrote: > > Dan Korostelev wrote: > > > > A license specific to Debian is not allowed. > > > I'll ask him about OOO icons license. I guess it's LGPL, but I dunno > > > exactly. > > 1) Most of the icons you want are already in ooo-build/desktop, i.e. almost > trivially available to the packageing scripts. They just have to be renamed.
oh :) And converted to png probably... > 2) Most of Jimmac's icons were painted for Ximian/Novell, so licenses won't > be a problem I guess, but anyway, asking him is the best way. Well, if they already are in ooo-icons I don't see a problem either but yes, asking him doesn't hurt ;) > > > despite icons license, can you at least make ooo .desktop icons > > themeable by > > > applying 'sed' magic, you mentioned (removing absolute paths)?? > > > > yes. done in CVS. Will be in 1.1.2-2. > > A comment from a backseat coder (i.e. from me; when will cvs move to > alioth?): it looks a bit strange that debian/rules first insert the path, Good question... > then strip it again ;-) We do? Oops :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature