Hi Ben
I have finished the patch for you with three of the four patches for th
libc on PowerPC.
This patch fixes:
- the sqrtl is a undefined symbol bug
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-05/msg00012.html
- the semctl fix for PowerPC
http://sources.redhat
tag 151225 + patch
thanks
Hi Ben
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 12:23:32AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>>> >severity 151225 important
>>> >thanks
>>> ok ...
>>> >This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this
>>> >point since the default (IOW, tested) compile is gcc-2.95.
>>> Th
Hi Ben ..
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:30:12PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>> >severity 151225 important
>> >thanks
>> ok ...
>> >This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this
>> >point since the default (IOW, tested) compile is gcc-2.95.
>> The point is, that working on OpenOffi
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:15:51AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> hi Ben
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:34:51PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >severity 151225 important
> >thanks
>
> ok ...
>
> >This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this
> >point since the default (IOW, t
hi Ben
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:34:51PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>severity 151225 important
>thanks
ok ...
>This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this
>point since the default (IOW, tested) compile is gcc-2.95.
The point is, that working on OpenOffice.org and we have
severity 151225 important
thanks
This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this
point since the default (IOW, tested) compile is gcc-2.95.
I'll worry about this later when I start moving towards glibc 2.3
snapshots.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:57:02AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Pali
6 matches
Mail list logo