On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:15:51AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: > hi Ben > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 09:34:51PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > >severity 151225 important > >thanks > > ok ... > > >This is hardly grave. Gcc-3.1 compatibility is not an issue at this > >point since the default (IOW, tested) compile is gcc-2.95. > > The point is, that working on OpenOffice.org and we have the problem, > that we build it with two compilers, gcc-3.0 on i386 (it works fine) and > gcc-2.95 on PPC. > > I want to switch to gcc-3.1 for both supported arches ...
Go with what works for now. No need to switch to a compiler that isn't supported by the architecture. You will have many more headaches. > >I'll worry about this later when I start moving towards glibc 2.3 > >snapshots. > > May I ask, when later is? When they start making pre-releases. I'll probably incorporate the ppc patches within a few weeks, but the severity really isn't warranted. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
