Your message dated Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:34:13 +0200
with message-id <12d64b1c-fc67-4854-b365-14fd8d52e...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1073807: windows binaries without source
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073807,
regarding windows binaries without source
to be marked as done.
Package: libreoffice
Severity: serious
User: paul...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
There are some windows binaries in
testtools/source/cliversioning/version_libs/version_3_0_0.dll. The readme
notes that the files aren't reproducable give
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:34:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#918183: fixed in liborcus 0.14.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #918183,
regarding liborcus: autopkgtest dependencies on old binaries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: liborcus
Version: 0.14.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
liborcus's autopkgtest has dependencies on binaries that are no longer
produced by the source package, which is causing test fai
Your message dated Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:34:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#868197: fixed in libmwaw 0.3.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #868197,
regarding libmwaw-tools description names the wrong binaries (from
libvisio-tools)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: libmwaw-tools
Severity: minor
This package's description states:
> This package contains vsd2xtml and vsd2raw.
Those are actually from libvisio-tools (including an old misspelling).
libmwaw-tools contains mwaw2{html,raw,text}. Don't know if they actually
need to be mentioned at all.
-
.oxt to include-binaries
---
source/include-binaries | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/source/include-binaries b/source/include-binaries
index ac39496..17afcac 100644
--- a/source/include-binaries
+++ b/source/include-binaries
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
debian/templates/debian
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rene pushed a commit to branch master
in repository libreoffice.
commit 7939a97acfdfed1793a73b20ce0304dbb85340b8
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Sat May 14 09:27:26 2016 +0200
update source/include-binaries for liborcus
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rene pushed a commit to annotated tag libreoffice_5.1.2-1
in repository libreoffice.
commit 753b5c2fcd4afe9df67b1ceb24a07a13183e797d
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Thu Apr 7 22:31:38 2016 +0200
and include-binaries (of
update shlibs.override.orcus;
add orcus 0.11 tarball to include-binaries
---
changelog | 1 +
patches/liborcus-0.11.diff | 15 +++
shlibs.override.orcus | 4 ++--
source/include-binaries| 1 +
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
/ods/passwordOld.ods from include-binaries
---
source/include-binaries | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/source/include-binaries b/source/include-binaries
index e49da42..ac39496 100644
--- a/source/include-binaries
+++ b/source/include-binaries
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
debian/templates
/passwordOld.ods from include-binaries
---
source/include-binaries | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/source/include-binaries b/source/include-binaries
index e49da42..ac39496 100644
--- a/source/include-binaries
+++ b/source/include-binaries
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
debian/templates/debian
revno: 2358
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Sun 2011-01-30 18:07:42 +0100
message:
update debian/watch to look after the binaries in stable/, not src, as that
versio is different
modified:
changelog
watch
revno: 2177
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Sun 2010-11-07 12:20:41 +0100
message:
add debian-presentation* to source/include-binaries
added:
source/include-binaries
=== added file 'source/include-bin
revno: 2085
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Sun 2010-11-07 12:18:01 +0100
message:
add debian-presentation* to source/include-binaries
modified:
source/include-binaries
=== modified file 'source/in
revno: 2097
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Thu 2010-09-16 15:03:17 +0200
message:
remove unneeded include-binaries
removed:
source/include-binaries
=== removed file 'source/include-binaries'
--
revno: 2045
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Tue 2010-06-29 14:25:01 +0200
message:
actually add debian/source/include-binaries
added:
source/include-binaries
=== added file 'source/include-binaries&#
revno: 1963
committer: Rene Engelhard
branch nick: debian
timestamp: Fri 2010-05-07 13:26:51 +0200
message:
we don't have ooo_custom_images in debian/ anymore, remove
source/include-binaries
removed:
source/include-bin
Hello;
I spent the 6 hours and built the OO.o 2.1 debs for AMD64 from the
official source in experimental. Nothing special; just the usual apt-get
source && cd openoffice-2.1/ && dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc.
Just a friendly offer here to upload a build of OO.o 2.1 for AMD64. Let
me know if this is o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> ca. 40 M -> 60M. How's that 60M bigger?
For the record, I was referring to Installed-Size, not Size, and
probably should have been clearer about that. At any rate, it was
about a 50% increase either way.
> It's now at the old size again (
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:25:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295916: openoffice.org-bin: installs unstripped (huge)
binaries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: important
On i386, openoffice.org-bin 1.1.3-5 is about 60M bigger than 1.1.3-4.
As far as I can tell, the reason for this is that the binaries it
ships (in and under /usr/lib/openoffice/program/) are no longer
stripped, in violation of Policy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jan Mynarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: OpenOffice.org binaries doesn't reflect LANG
settings
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.28
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:58:46 +0
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.0.99+1.1rc3-1
Severity: normal
Problem: OOo is in Czech but I want it to be in English.
These are my locales (output from 'locale' command):
LANG=POSIX
LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.ISO-8859-2
LC_NUMERIC="POSIX"
LC_TIME="POSIX"
LC_COLLATE="POSIX"
LC_MONETARY="POSIX"
LC_MES
Hi ..
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:19:49AM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
>Are there "official" debian binaries available yet? Im sorry if this is well
>known but im new to debian (Mandrake convert)
Not official yet, but there are debs of OpenOffice.org.
Have a look to www.linux-debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are there "official" debian binaries available yet? Im sorry if this is well
known but im new to debian (Mandrake convert)
Thanks
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Thomas Quaritsch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I do not want to compile Openoffice.org, I just want to install the
> binaries that are available. But I can't even run the setup program.
> [...]
I got the solution from Bernhard R. Link. It see
Hi!
I do not want to compile Openoffice.org, I just want to install the
binaries that are available. But I can't even run the setup program.
That's how it looks like when I try to run the setup:
,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./setup
| glibc version: 2.2.4
| [EMAIL PROTECTE
28 matches
Mail list logo
