zipdep and oo-xvfb-run (Was: Re: New diff.gz and .dsc)

Samuli Suonpaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I couldn't figure out why. The command I used to start the build > process was 'fakeroot debian/rules build'. Now trying with 'debuild > -rfakeroot'. Will report that run in the morning. Ok, done. Let's se

Re: New diff.gz and .dsc

Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I applied the three patches from Chris related to xvfb-run. > I hope, the build on intel will just finish ... > please try it out and mail some errormessages to this list (no > bugreports to BTS :P). First thing, right at the start: chmod: getting

Re: New diff.gz and .dsc

Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I applied the three patches from Chris related to xvfb-run. How about giving new files new names every now and then? Feels quite odd having downloaded openoffice_0.641c-1.diff.gz for God knows how many times and every time ended up with different res

Re: [dev] Somethhing failed with rsclexx.h

Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you get the same problem again, please include the part of the > log where it tries to build the bmp files. Ok, here we go. Now using the diff and dsc from March 13. Logged to the box with 'ssh -X' so DISPLAY _is_ set, definitely. XAUTHORITY is _not_ s

Re: [dev] Somethhing failed with rsclexx.h

Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you get the same problem again, please include the part of the log where > it tries to build the bmp files. Hate to sound stupid on a public mailing list, but what the hell... Log? What log? Where? Does the build system automatically make a log somew

Re: [dev] Somethhing failed with rsclexx.h

Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > did you have cleared the $XAUTHORITY variable? It might make some > problems if not! I didn't have to clear anything, since it wasn't declared in the first place. $ env | grep XAUTH $ > There are some erros in debian/rules .. I hope to upload a c

Re: [dev] Somethhing failed with rsclexx.h

Samuli Suonpaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> yes. The real error message is about 5 screens earlier: "Can't >> connect to X server" (or similar). You need a working connection to >> an X server as writ

Re: [dev] Somethhing failed with rsclexx.h

Michael Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 06:58:17PM +0100, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: >> f258: Error: This file cannot be opened. >> Terminating compiler >> Error starting rsc2 compiler >> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngppc.pro/bin/svt64149.res' >> ---* TG_SL

Build failure: Can't open input file "../../unxlngi3.pro/srs/dbwizres.srs"

I was trying to build debianized OpenOffice 641c from and got bit with the following error: Preprocessor startline: rscpp @/tmp/file0GeVjU ../../unxlngi3.pro/srs/dbwizres.srs: No such file or directory cpp: line 0, Error: Can't open in

Re: Can OpenOffice really be GPL?

Michael Boman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing I noticed is that zip/unzip is required.. If I am not > wrong I thought that the pkzip stuff had some wierd license > agreement? Why should you care about "some weird license agreement" of _pkzip_? Use Info-ZIP, it's free and you can find packag