Processed: found 419095 in 1:2.4.0-3, usertagging 419095

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26 > found 419095 1:2.4.0-3 Bug#419095: plese provide en_Ca dictionary Bug marked as found in version 1:2.4.0-3. > usertags 419095 - openoffice.org-old-bugs Bug#419095: plese provide en_

Processed: tagging 419095

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26 > tags 419095 - moreinfo Bug#419095: plese provide en_Ca dictionary Tags were: moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1059: merge

revno: 1059 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Sun 2008-04-27 01:18:26 +0200 message: merge modified: changelog rules rev

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1057: merge

revno: 1057 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Sun 2008-04-27 01:02:50 +0200 message: merge modified: changelog control rules --

./packages/openofficeorg/3.0/experimental r1058: - support default-jdk-builddep, begin support of openjdk-6-jdk for

revno: 1058 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Sun 2008-04-27 01:17:58 +0200 message: - support default-jdk-builddep, begin support of openjdk-6-jdk for building, still default to ja

./packages/openofficeorg/2.4/unstable r1084: correct control.mono.in inclusion regardless of host architecture

revno: 1084 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Sun 2008-04-27 01:17:18 +0200 message: correct control.mono.in inclusion regardless of host architecture modified: changelog rules === modified

./packages/openofficeorg/2.4/unstable r1083: + - fix java-gcj-compat-dev build-depends conditional logic to set the

revno: 1083 committer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> branch nick: debian timestamp: Sun 2008-04-27 00:50:26 +0200 message: +- fix java-gcj-compat-dev build-depends conditional logic to set the + right versioned build-dep

Re: OO.o source and new hunspell dicts packaging

Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 22:50 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > So in the end, is the fr_FR hunspell version the only dictionary not to be > > packaged? I was a little ambitious about the needed amount of work... ;-) > > Is there any problems about making it a new package so we can benefit from >

Processed: notfound 364334 in 2.0.1-5, found 364334 in 2.0.1-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26 > notfound 364334 2.0.1-5 Bug#364334: openoffice.org-writer: Toolbars should not be sticky with fvwm2 Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.0.1-5. > found 364334 2.0.1-5 Bug#3643

Processed: notfound 475092 in 2.4.0-3, found 475092 in 1:2.4.0-3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26 > notfound 475092 2.4.0-3 Bug#475092: Error on open a second file with accents on their name Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.4.0-3. > found 475092 1:2.4.0-3 Bug#475092: Err

openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.4.0~m240-2_amd64.changes is NEW

hunspell-da_2.4.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org-dictionaries/hunspell-da_2.4.0-2_all.deb (new) hunspell-fr_2.4.0-2_all.deb optional text French dictionary for hunpell This is the French dictionary for use with the hunspell spellchecker hunspell-ne_2.4.0-2_all.deb to pool/main/o/openo

Processing of openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.4.0~m240-2_amd64.changes

openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.4.0~m240-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.4.0~m240-2.dsc openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.4.0~m240-2.diff.gz openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us_2.4.0-2_all.deb openoffice.org-thesaurus-cs_2.4.0-2_a

Re: OO.o source and new hunspell dicts packaging

Hi, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > > I'm thinking of the new French dictionary that has been updated to use > > > hunspell and which is very nice. But I can see about 25 dicts in the > > > > And what are they built from? The myspell version was built from a > > exte

Re: OO.o source and new hunspell dicts packaging

Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 18:15 +0200, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > [ WTF did you remove the Cc to debian-openoffice? ] Sorry, I did not notice you added it and I just hit "reply to sender". > > Hi, > > Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > I'm thinking of the new French dictionary that has been updated t

Bug#418224: marked as done (openoffice.org: Copy and Paste Utf8 Problem with Konqueror Html)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:35:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: openoffice.org: Copy and Paste Utf8 Problem with Konqueror Html has caused the Debian Bug report #418224, regarding openoffice.org: Copy and Paste Utf8 Problem with Konqueror Html to be mar

Bug#342594: marked as done (openoffice.org-writer: Ignores command -pt printer_name; prints to default printer)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:27:56 +0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#342594: The 2nd Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #342594 has caused the Debian Bug report #342594, regarding openoffice.org-writer: Ignores command -pt printer_name; prints to de

Re: OO.o source and new hunspell dicts packaging

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > zu_ZA -> hmm, indeed missing. Nevermind on this, doesn't contain a spellchecking dictionary. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OO.o source and new hunspell dicts packaging

[ WTF did you remove the Cc to debian-openoffice? ] Hi, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le samedi 26 avril 2008 à 17:03 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > > As of 2.4, OO.o upstream provides many updated hunspell dictionaries in > > > their source. These are

Bug#364334: The 2nd Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #364334

forwarded 364334 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88752 thanks Hi, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > I just *told* you (cf. #30 from about an hour before your mail was > sent) that I can reproduce this bug. Well, then just time overlap between the automatic mails and your reply. What ar

Processed: Re: Bug#364334: The 2nd Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #364334

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 364334 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88752 Bug#364334: openoffice.org-writer: Toolbars should not be sticky with fvwm2 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=887

Processed: found 378740 in 1:2.4.0-4, usertagging 378740

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26 > found 378740 1:2.4.0-4 Bug#378740: openoffice.org-gnome: Control-shift hotkeys broken in Gtk/UTF8 environment Bug marked as found in version 1:2.4.0-4. > usertags 378740 - openoffi

Re: OO.o source and new hunspell dicts packaging

Hi, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > As of 2.4, OO.o upstream provides many updated hunspell dictionaries in > their source. These are much smarter than standard dictionaries we have > in Debian, and are maintained by communities that have cleaned them up For example? > and added many words. Fedora

Bug#364334: The 2nd Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #364334

Hello Lior, On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 06:40:41PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Thanks for your interest in OO.org and the bug report [1] you have > contributed: > #364334: openoffice.org-writer: Toolbars should not be sticky with fvwm2 > > Openoffice.org 2.4.0, is available from the unstable, testing

Bug#385332: marked as done (openoffice.org: ignores Xft settings)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:15:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#385332: The 2nd Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #385332 has caused the Debian Bug report #385332, regarding openoffice.org: ignores Xft settings to be marked as done. This means

Processed: found 380748 in 1:2.4.0-4, usertagging 380748

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26 > found 380748 1:2.4.0-4 Bug#380748: openoffice.org: impossible to have OOo on two workspaces Bug marked as found in version 1:2.4.0-4. > usertags 380748 - openoffice.org-old-bugs Bug

Bug#400419: marked as done (openoffice.org-gtk: ugly UI fonts and slow window drawing)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:06:14 +0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: close bug #400419 has caused the Debian Bug report #400419, regarding openoffice.org-gtk: ugly UI fonts and slow window drawing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob