Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:15:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#385332: The 2nd Debian Openoffice.org bug triage - bug #385332 has caused the Debian Bug report #385332, regarding openoffice.org: ignores Xft settings to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately.) -- 385332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=385332 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.3-2 Severity: normal OOo ignores the Xft settings, set in the GNOME control panel. Here are my current settings: Xft.antialias: 1 Xft.dpi: 96.000000 Xft.hinting: 1 Xft.hintstyle: hintfull Xft.rgba: rgb As shows the attached screenshot, GNOME (just as most applications using Xft) takes this into account, with sub-pixel rendering and native hinting. However, OOo ignores these settings: it doesn't use sub-pixel rendering, and uses the autohinter instead of the native hinting. This leads to these ugly fonts (especially as the autohinter is very bad at rendering Bitstream Vera). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)<<attachment: Capture.png>>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1:2.4.0-4 Le vendredi 25 avril 2008 à 18:40 +0300, Lior Kaplan a écrit : > Thanks for your interest in OO.org and the bug report [1] you have > contributed: > #385332: openoffice.org: ignores Xft settings > > Openoffice.org 2.4.0, is available from the unstable, testing and backports > repositories, and is newer than the version you reported to be problematic. > > Please reproduce your bug on an updated version and confirm it still exists, > or close it as irrelevant for recent versions. This bug seems finally fixed in 2.4.0, thanks. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
--- End Message ---
