On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 20:59 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I am desperately in need of a Sarge backport of OOo2. I have started
> tinkering around with building it based on the infrastructure put in
> place by by version 2.0.0-2.
On the 21st, Rene sent a post to this list saying that he's mad
I am desperately in need of a Sarge backport of OOo2. I have started
tinkering around with building it based on the infrastructure put in
place by by version 2.0.0-2.
I was receiving a "no such file" error for hunspell-1.0.8.tar.gz (or
something like that), which I was able to circumvent by simpl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:03:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
In the meantime I have managed to compile the 2.6.12 kernel by myself
with the same config as I used in the 2.6.8 kernel (except the new
options).
I've tested openoffice 1.1.4-7 for a while, but the problem did _not_
accur anymore.
To summarise:
- the self-built kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.12 have no p
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > the sarge backport of OOo 2.0.0-2 is done and will be available on
> > backports.org when the archive setup is coplete there. For now, you can
> > get it from www.backports.org/pending (see http://www.backports.org).
> >
> > You can use it
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
oooqs-kde |2.0.3-6 | s390
ooqstart-gnome |0.8.3-8 | s390
openoffice.org-dev |1.1.4-7 | s390
openoffice.org-evolution |1.1.4-7 | s390
Note that the package(s) have simply b
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:18:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "fixed" due to removal of neon0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:18:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "fixed" due to removal of neon0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 324640 openoffice.org
Bug#324640: please build a shared library
Bug reassigned from package `mythes' to `openoffice.org'.
> retitle 324640 please build shared mythes library
Bug#324640: please build a shared library
Changed Bug title.
> tags
I have found a work around for this problem.
I use KDE as my desktop and have the mouse set to "Focus Strictly Under
Mouse"; changing this setting (in Desktop->Window Behaviour->Focus) to any
of:
Focus Under Mouse
Focus Follows Mouse
Click To Focus
Makes this bug go away. I've found "Focus Un
Hi
I solved the problem by erasing .gnome and .gnome2 (and .gconf and .gconfd).
I don't know if you prefeer moving this bug to gnome or closing it.
Thanks.
maxxer
11 matches
Mail list logo
