On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:06 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Drew Parsons wrote:
> > 1) openoffice.org2-common Depends: openoffice.org2-l10n-en-us
> >
> > Is en-us *truly* necessary for OOo2 to work?
>
> Yes. In some circumstances it just crashes without it.
>
> Maybe it would even make
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 21:46 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Curiosity: why won't 1.1.5 build with sid? Is sid that out of
> > date (tools held back by some other dependency?), or did Sun/OOo
>
> No. Ironically, it's apparently too up to date.
> Newer gcc/binutils br
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Curiosity: why won't 1.1.5 build with sid? Is sid that out of
> date (tools held back by some other dependency?), or did Sun/OOo
No. Ironically, it's apparently too up to date.
Newer gcc/binutils breaks the build. I don't really have the time to
look after that; I don't
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 20:41 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Still, I'm thinking that there will be more than a few people,
> > especially in organizational settings (where, as you known things
> > tend to change more slowly), who will want to retain OOo 1.x even
> > i
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Still, I'm thinking that there will be more than a few people,
> especially in organizational settings (where, as you known things
> tend to change more slowly), who will want to retain OOo 1.x even
> if it were dropped from the release tree.
They use stable (sarge), Or o
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 20:07 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ please learn how to quote properly. Thanks. ]
>
> Hi,
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > So, as far as Debian is concerned, once 2 is released 1.x gets
> > sent into the ether, never to be allowed back in?
>
> That's the plan. No one would wan
[ please learn how to quote properly. Thanks. ]
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> So, as far as Debian is concerned, once 2 is released 1.x gets
> sent into the ether, never to be allowed back in?
That's the plan. No one would want it anyway once 2.x is released...
We're the one of last big ones ones act
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:42 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:06 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > No. This is no bug. This is completely intentional. OOo1 and OOo2
> > > thesauri are incompatile. OOo1 ones won't work in OOo2 and vice versa.
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:06 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [snip]
> > No. This is no bug. This is completely intentional. OOo1 and OOo2
> > thesauri are incompatile. OOo1 ones won't work in OOo2 and vice versa.
> > Since both use /etc/openoffice/dictionary.lst for looking which
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.4-7
Severity: important
Autocomplete makes OOo Spreadsheet practically unusable.
For example, if I have previously entered "865GV", trying to enter "8" will
make OOo fill in "865GV". I cannot press Delete, left arrow, or right arrow to
cancel the autocomple
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 18:06 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
[snip]
> No. This is no bug. This is completely intentional. OOo1 and OOo2
> thesauri are incompatile. OOo1 ones won't work in OOo2 and vice versa.
> Since both use /etc/openoffice/dictionary.lst for looking which thesauri
> are there and eac
Hi,
Drew Parsons wrote:
> 1) openoffice.org2-common Depends: openoffice.org2-l10n-en-us
>
> Is en-us *truly* necessary for OOo2 to work?
Yes. In some circumstances it just crashes without it.
> It would make more sense to me to use a virtual package
> openoffice.org2-l10n, which all the l10n p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329106 wishlist
Bug#329106: Please change debian/control to include amd64
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329106 wishlist
Bug#329106: Please change debian/control to include amd64
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Hi OO Debian developers,
thanks for preparing OpenOffice.org 2 Beta2 and putting it in
experimental. I'm testing it now (1.9.125+2.0beta2-1). A couple of
matters related to package dependencies feel wrong, so I thought I'd ask
on the list before submitting bugs.
1) openoffice.org2-common Depend
[ if you are replying to bugs, please let the bug Cc'ed ]
Hi,
Am Tuesday 20 September 2005 15:06 schrieben Sie:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > OOo2 may build on amd64 but working is another matter and thefefore
> > amd64 is not included in that Architecture line.
> > ...
> > Anyway, my local copy he
16 matches
Mail list logo
