On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 20:41 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Ron Johnson wrote: > > Still, I'm thinking that there will be more than a few people, > > especially in organizational settings (where, as you known things > > tend to change more slowly), who will want to retain OOo 1.x even > > if it were dropped from the release tree. > > They use stable (sarge), Or oldstable if etch is out and stable. > > > Also, there will be people who'd want to run both in parallel for > > a time, testing, seeing differences, etc. > > Maybe. But will they want to stick with 1.1.4? Or want 1.1.5? Which > doesn't even build with sid/etchs toolchain anymore? And as I guess > 1.1.4 won't do do 1.1.4 is probaby RC-buggy and unless it can be > fixed...
Well, you're The Man, and not only that, The Volunteer, so... Curiosity: why won't 1.1.5 build with sid? Is sid that out of date (tools held back by some other dependency?), or did Sun/OOo do something weird? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Temporarily not of Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. The political implications of this picture are pretty amazing. http://www-1.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/waywewore/waywewore_28. html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
