On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 02:16 +0300, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > What are the plans for packaging openoffice.org 2.0?
>
> Work in progress. There's already 1.9.114 debs in experimental. Help of
> course welcome :)
Specifically:
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ ..
Hi,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What are the plans for packaging openoffice.org 2.0?
Work in progress. There's already 1.9.114 debs in experimental. Help of
course welcome :)
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://peo
Get rid of premature ejaculation and last longer
http://www.fuxnyp.com/ss/
Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?
Diplomacy: lying in state.
We make our fortunes and call them fate.
Fashion is for people who don't know who they are.
Genius is talent prov
What are the plans for packaging openoffice.org 2.0?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reach new customers on the internet and grow your business... with dynamic
software, you can!
http://lmzm.4tqj73mxjwmb154.razorfallb.com
Give no decision till both sides thou'st heard.
'Whom are you?' he asked, for he had attended business college.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:28:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318072: openoffice.org2-evolution: Does not need
dependency on openoffice.org2-base
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
I just tried to do some tests with the evolution-integration, and even
tho' I never got far, it's quite obvious that ooo2-evo needs the
base-component. ;)
If I find the time, I might look further into and report all the
crashes I just experienced, but at least they got nothing to do with
this wish
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Because of the second I made -evolution depend on -base because it
> somehow contains a odb for evolution...
it = openoffice.org2-common...
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debi
On 7/13/05, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heikki Henriksen wrote:
> > Having gone through and checked all linked files in the package, I can
> > not find the reason for the dependency on openoffice.org2-base.
> $ dpkg --contents openoffice.org2-common_1.9.116-0.pre1_all.deb | grep odb
Hi,
Heikki Henriksen wrote:
> Unless I've missed something obvious completely, I would really
> appreciate it if this dependency is removed :)
I am a bit unsure myself and don't exactly remember anymore. It could
very well be that I wrote it accidentially in -gnome too as/after I did
it at -evolu
Hi,
Heikki Henriksen wrote:
> Having gone through and checked all linked files in the package, I can
> not find the reason for the dependency on openoffice.org2-base.
$ dpkg --contents openoffice.org2-common_1.9.116-0.pre1_all.deb | grep odb
-rw-r--r-- root/root 2790 2005-07-13 00:34:19
./u
Package: openoffice.org2-gnome
Version: 1.9.114-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
Having gone through and checked all linked files in the package, I can
not find the reason for the dependency on openoffice.org2-base.
Unless I've missed something obvious completely, I would really
appreciate
Package: openoffice.org2-evolution
Version: 1.9.114-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
Having gone through and checked all linked files in the package, I can
not find the reason for the dependency on openoffice.org2-base.
Unless I've missed something obvious completely, I would really
apprec
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.4-3+1
Severity: normal
Hi,
if I do a $ openoffice unknowfile
i got :
OpenOffice.org lockfile found (/home/castetm/.openoffice/1.1.3/.lock)
Using existing OpenOffice.org
sh: crash_report: command not found
Fatal exception: Signal 6
Stack:
/usr/li
14 matches
Mail list logo
