Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:28:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318072: openoffice.org2-evolution: Does not need
dependency on openoffice.org2-base
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 08:52:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 01:52:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dscyi-00073l-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:52:28 -0700
Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59])
by osl1smout1.broadpark.no
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:52:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from renaissance.heitech.no ([80.202.208.45])
by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:55:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by renaissance.heitech.no (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0BF2E3315; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:52:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:52:05 +0200
From: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org2-evolution: Does not need dependency on
openoffice.org2-base
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org2-evolution
Version: 1.9.114-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
Having gone through and checked all linked files in the package, I can
not find the reason for the dependency on openoffice.org2-base.
Unless I've missed something obvious completely, I would really
appreciate it if this dependency is removed :)
Cheers.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (401, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages openoffice.org2-evolution depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii openoffice.org2-base 1.9.114-1 OpenOffice.org office suite - data
ii openoffice.org2-core 1.9.114-1 OpenOffice.org office suite archit
Versions of packages openoffice.org2-evolution recommends:
ii evolution 2.2.2-4 The groupware suite
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318072-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 16:28:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 09:28:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dsk6O-0006GG-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:28:52 -0700
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so241222rne
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=iHK4mt74Wvv9FwmZGgaobbhnrUT0o/Npi54msk3AF3NffAVvJDIqR9nv3ejZYl/zR1Cz+2cpnQQ4PLQRR7cGQfgDhb4tP5gAcAnObpDITdMUsTj9dRfuQc/Ja4R2BH0fn06SwhFD+sNmmm2hcL2I07Kpbsb6EA0DQspDeqeHwr8=
Received: by 10.38.101.1 with SMTP id y1mr938090rnb;
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.209.80 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:28:31 +0200
From: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#318072: openoffice.org2-evolution: Does not need dependency on
openoffice.org2-base
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
I just tried to do some tests with the evolution-integration, and even
tho' I never got far, it's quite obvious that ooo2-evo needs the
base-component. ;)
If I find the time, I might look further into and report all the
crashes I just experienced, but at least they got nothing to do with
this wishlist-bug, so I'll close it.
Cheers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
