Bug#174490: marked as done (openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings)

2003-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:17:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#174490: openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian/patches by gromitt

2003-02-21 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches who:gromitt time: Sat Feb 22 00:32:25 UTC 2003 Log Message: openoffice.org (1.0.2-2.3pre2) unstable; urgency=low * fixed the patch 906_set_gnome_menu_right.diff, its should not fix sysui/unix/office/gnome, it is in sysui/oounix/office/g

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by gromitt

2003-02-21 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian who:gromitt time: Sat Feb 22 00:32:25 UTC 2003 Log Message: openoffice.org (1.0.2-2.3pre2) unstable; urgency=low * fixed the patch 906_set_gnome_menu_right.diff, its should not fix sysui/unix/office/gnome, it is in sysui/oounix/office/gnome.

Starting openoffice with URP port open fails

2003-02-21 Thread Holger Krug
Hi, Please excuse my cross-posting, but on users@openoffice.org I received no answer. Because this issue well might be Debian specific, I decided to resend to question at this place. I've started working on Openoffice component development using the recently beta-released SDK. On requirement is t

Bug#174490: openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings

2003-02-21 Thread Tamas SZERB
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Chris Halls wrote: Seems my old machine is totally buggy, it works now in the other, brand new installed debian unstable. Thanks the information, you can close the bug. > On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:31:02PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > > This is stranger - you must have spadmin

Bug#171996: marked as done (openoffice.org: Options|Load/Save|HTML Compatibility gives unrecoverable error)

2003-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:26:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#171996: openoffice.org: Options|Load/Save|HTML Compatibility gives unrecoverable error - closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#181810: openoffice.org: libfreetype6 dependency incorrect for Sarge

2003-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 181810 Woody backport will not install on Sarge - libfreetype6 > incompatibility Bug#181810: openoffice.org: libfreetype6 dependency incorrect for Sarge Changed Bug title. > tag 181810 + sarge Bug#181810: Woody backport will not install on Sar

Bug#174490: openoffice.org-debian-files: no spadmin file and spadmin.bin doesn't save the printer settings

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Halls
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 05:31:02PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > This is stranger - you must have spadmin on your machine. If you don't, you > have a problem with the installation of the packages. Please try > reinstalling the openoffice.org package to make sure all the files are in > place. What'

Bug#181810: openoffice.org: libfreetype6 dependency incorrect for Sarge

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Halls
retitle 181810 Woody backport will not install on Sarge - libfreetype6 incompatibility tag 181810 + sarge thanks On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:49:54PM +, Neil Darlow wrote: > openoffice.org-bin is held back on upgrade for Sarge because it depends > on libfreetype6-2.0.9 while Sarge has libfreet

Bug#176045: openoffice.org: I can reproduce in 1.0.2

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Halls
(This is not the same as bug #176045) On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:44:04AM -0900, Curtis Nelson wrote: > ./setup.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libcomphelp2.so: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Well, that file is contained in the openoffice.org-bin package: $

Bug#181702: marked as done (openoffice.org: X-Server Crash)

2003-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:26:46 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#181702: mysteriously resolved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Open Office 1.0.2 formats differently on different OSes

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Halls
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:55:35PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 21:34, Gianfranco Berardi wrote: > > Has anyone else had problems where Open Office for Windows and Open > > Office for Linux render the same file differently? Is it a font > > installation problem, or some s

Re: Open Office 1.0.2 formats differently on different OSes

2003-02-21 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 21:34, Gianfranco Berardi wrote: > > I have a two page document that I created on my Debian GNU/Linux system, > and at the top of each page I have the words "Truman County." These are > in the document body and are not headers (nor do I want them to be). > At the bottom of

Open Office 1.0.2 formats differently on different OSes

2003-02-21 Thread Gianfranco Berardi
I sent a copy of this to Debian-Users as well. They suggested I contact the Open Office people. I am using Woody with kernel 2.4.18. This was added to my sources.list so I can apt-get Open Office. deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/ woody main contrib It is an unoff