OpenOffice 1.0.2 crashing on setup. Backtrace attached.

I'm running debian stable, and it's fairly up to date (I just did apt-get update; apt-get upgrade). Here's what's happening: I downloaded http://sf1.mirror.openoffice.org/stable/1.0.2/OOo_1.0.2_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz I successfully run ./install --prefix=/opt as directed by http://ww

OO 1.0.2 backported to woody

FYI: I've backported OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 to woody and added these packages to a larger collection of packages I do maintain [1]. Notes regarding these packages: - they are compiled using a backported gcc 3.2.1 - as a workaround for the problem with the same file in several packages each open

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:45, Sander Vesik wrote: > --- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gwenole, > > > > [CCing to debian-openoffice] > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > > This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit > > >

Python UNO

Could someone point me to the right place to look for Python UNO? Isn't it already included in those pretty debian packages, by chance? Thanks

Bug#176045: marked as done (openoffice.org: Memory Access Fault for user setup)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:59:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#176045: openoffice.org: Memory Access Fault for user setup] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

--- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gwenole, > > [CCing to debian-openoffice] > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit > > architectures. > [...] > > * Linux/Alpha: Debian people showed

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

Hi .. On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:35:02PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: >[CCing to debian-openoffice] >On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: >> This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit >> architectures. >[...] >> * Linux/Alpha: Debian people showed i

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

Hi Gwenole, [CCing to debian-openoffice] On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit > architectures. [...] > * Linux/Alpha: Debian people showed interest > , but no pa

[installer@ftp-master.debian.org: openoffice.org_1.0.2-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED]

- Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org_1.0.2-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:47:24 -0500 Accepted: openoffice.org-bin_1.0.2-1_powerpc.deb to pool/contr

Processed: Re: Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 171623 - moreinfo Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup Tags were: moreinfo sid Tags removed: moreinfo > tags 171623 - sid Bug#171623: openoffice.org: OO crashes upon startup Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid > retitle 171623 crash o

Processed: tagging 176045

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 176045 + unreproducible Bug#176045: openoffice.org: Memory Access Fault for user setup Tags were: moreinfo sid Tags added: unreproducible > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#174085: openoffice.org: Print preview hangs Open Office

tags 174085 + unreproducable thanks Hi, any update on this report or shall I close it? There is a new version in unstable now. Thanks, Chris

Processed: Re: Bug#176045: openoffice.org: Memory Access Fault for user setup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 176045 important Bug#176045: openoffice.org: Memory Access Fault for user setup Severity set to `important'. > tags 176045 + unreproduceable Unknown tag/s: unreproduceable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woo

Processed: Re: Bug#174085: openoffice.org: Print preview hangs Open Office

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 174085 + unreproducable Unknown tag/s: unreproducable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge experimental d-i. Bug#174085: openoffice.org: Print preview hangs Open Office

Bug#176045: openoffice.org: Memory Access Fault for user setup

severity 176045 important tags 176045 + unreproduceable tags 176045 + moreinfo thanks On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:29:07AM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > Hi, can you see if you can get setup to generate a coredump to send to me? I've still not heard back about this bug. There is a new upstream releas

Re: catalan l10n for openoffice 1.0.1

[CCing to debian-openoffice for reference] Hi Albert, On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:33:10PM +0100, Albert Cervera Areny wrote: > Do you know how I could do that? I'd be iterested if it is not very > difficult and as I have no experience with open office sources some help > or orientation would be ve