Time to file an issue.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9879
Seems they already closed the bug.
Chris
Laurdag 7. desember 2002 21:40 skreiv Joey Hess:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Really?
> >
> > We once got a report that this seems to be a problem:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=165036
>
> That bug report didn't provide a full log of the failure, but as far as
> I can tell
Hi Joey,
Joey Hess wrote:
> On the other hand, if nothing in openoffice.org's postinst needs
> openoffice.org-debian-files to be configured (which seems likely), and
> the converse is also true, then there is no problem with having a cycle
> in the dependencies. It's even ok if either postinst nee
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:rene
time: Sat Dec 7 21:19:33 UTC 2002
Log Message:
Let -bin and -l10n-* depend on openoffice.org
Files:
changed:changelog control control.in control.lang.in
Repository: oo-debian-files/debian
who:rene
time: Sat Dec 7 21:14:03 UTC 2002
Log Message:
Depend on openoffice.org
Files:
changed:changelog control
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Really?
>
> We once got a report that this seems to be a problem:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=165036
That bug report didn't provide a full log of the failure, but as far as
I can tell what probably happened is that openoffice.org failed to
configu
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:58:55PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I do too. And with -u. And it holds back packages on some apt-get
> upgrade things without asking me..
This happens if a) some of the dependencies are no available
b) some of the dependencies conflict with packages already installe
Hi,
Juraj Ziegler wrote:
> The above statement is wrong. When apt-get is asked to upgrade a
> package, and the new version of the package has an additional (new)
> dependency, apt-get asks the user whether to install the additional
> packages.
>
> Running 'apt-get -u upgrade' displays more deta
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:33:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark J. Small wrote:
> > Everything installed nicely from there...
> >
> > Any ideas on what's going on? Why wasn't the debian-files package
> > selected with apt-get upgrade when it was with dselect?
>
> That's a f
Hi Mark,
Mark J. Small wrote:
> Everything installed nicely from there...
>
> Any ideas on what's going on? Why wasn't the debian-files package
> selected with apt-get upgrade when it was with dselect?
That's a feature of apt.
You've used apt-get update. apt-get update only installs newer ver
I tried to install again this morning, and something new had hit the
mirrors, but I still can't fully upgrade.
Here what happened
bash-2.05a# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back
openoffice.org openoffice.org
Hi Joey,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > This is a dummy RC bug to prevent openoffice.org-debian-files going
> > into testing before openoffice.org itelf will be in it (it will go
> > into testing because it doesn't depend -- only recommend because of
> > circular dependency problem o
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 05:37, Chris Halls wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:26:26PM -0500, Thomas R. Shemanske wrote:
> > I do not know whether to report this as a bug against
> > openoffice.org-debian-files or gnome-session, but it is a recurrent
> > problem.
>
> It is a probl
13 matches
Mail list logo
