oo vs gcc 3.2

Jan, Speaking of mirroring, what is the status of the gcc 3.2 rebuilds of OpenOffice.org 1.0.1? I am rather confused by the state of things as seen from... http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/main/stlport/ http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice/pool/con

Locales names in OOo

As you all know, the problem with OOo not keeping localization settings is now clear (at least to me) :-) It is due to OOo's strange handling of locales names. I figured out that forcing a translation in /usr/bin/openoffice from "fr_FR" to "fr-FR" solves the problem (cfr my previous e-mails abou

Re: Savage work around for OOo unstable

Hi .. On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:07:10PM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: >* Problems with S3 Savage chip >If you are running XFree86 4.x and have an S3 Savage chip, you must use >this workaround. Export this variable before starting openoffice: >SAL_DO_NOT_USE_INVERT50=true >

Are some only mirroring I386 Packages? [was: rowe_gnu@gmx.net: Where the working Mirrors with OpenOffice.org for Debian]

Hi .. I read this on debian-powerpc mailinglist ... is it possible, that some mirror do not include all packages or forgot only the powerpc packages? Regards Jan - Forwarded message from Roland Wegmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Roland Wegmann <[EMA

Re: OpenOffice in Woody?

Hi .. On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:42:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Does it make sence to build OOo with newer gcc/glibc/binutils etc etc on >> woody or should I only use the woody packages and the newer needed >> debhelper? >I would try to do the second, if that does not work we can try to

Re: Depends: libstdc++3 ??

Hi Rene .. On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:56:28AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: >> thnx for this issue .. your are right, it does not make sence toi depend >> against libstdc++3, because we are now building OOo with gcc-3.2, which >> will cause a dependency with libstdc++5. >