Re: OpenOffice.org 642 ....

Hi, It should build as is under ppc Linux but it still has some nits and bugs to iron out. I just found one tonight where frework has removed an interface that is still being used by other modules. So expect the tree to still have a few changes requiring a rebuild later as things are fixed.

OpenOffice.org 642 ....

Hi ... since there are some developments on OpenOffice.org 642, I just want to know, can we build it from scratch or are there some patches needed, which are not commited in? Kevin wrote much about build errors in 642, are they fixed? Can somebody say, when there will be a planed release? I ask

Re: [announce] OpenOffice.org 1.0.1-5 packages uploaded to unstable

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:18:09PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: >Finally, we took the plunge :) > >Rene has uploaded 1.0.1-5 to unstable/contrib. The new version will also >become available on the mirrors when they next sync. > >The changelog for the new version is available at the bottom of this mai

Re: [announce] OpenOffice.org 1.0.1-5 packages uploaded to unstable

Hi ... On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 02:49:15PM +0100, Paul Hedderly wrote: >> Finally, we took the plunge :) >> Rene has uploaded 1.0.1-5 to unstable/contrib. The new version will also >> become available on the mirrors when they next sync. >That is fantastic news! yeah! >Now we need to release Woo

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by haggai

Repository: oo-deb/debian who:haggai time: Tue Aug 20 16:43:25 UTC 2002 Log Message: Forgot to check in last changes Files: changed:control

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by haggai

Repository: oo-deb/debian who:haggai time: Tue Aug 20 16:42:16 UTC 2002 Log Message: Change spadmin -> oopadmin in documentation, thanks to Ken Shan Files: changed:README.Debian

Re: [announce] OpenOffice.org 1.0.1-5 packages uploaded to unstable

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:18:09PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: > Finally, we took the plunge :) > > Rene has uploaded 1.0.1-5 to unstable/contrib. The new version will also > become available on the mirrors when they next sync. That is fantastic news! Now we need to release Woody 3.1 :O) -- Paul

Re: [announce] OpenOffice.org 1.0.1-5 packages uploaded to unstable

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:18:09PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: > Finally, we took the plunge :) Congrats, and ... of course ... thanks! :-P Cheers, -- Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E pgpcVV9StrIy3.pgp Description: PGP signature

[announce] OpenOffice.org 1.0.1-5 packages uploaded to unstable

Finally, we took the plunge :) Rene has uploaded 1.0.1-5 to unstable/contrib. The new version will also become available on the mirrors when they next sync. The changelog for the new version is available at the bottom of this mail. The main highlights: * Moved to gcc-3.2 for both architecture

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian/patches by gromitt

Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches who:gromitt time: Tue Aug 20 08:31:48 UTC 2002 Log Message: Set proper compilerflags for PPC Files: changed:025_compilerflags.diff

Re: dmake in debian

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:59:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:01:58PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote: > > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > sysintf.o: In function `Get_temp': > > > sysintf.o(.text+0x5fc): the use of `tempnam' is dangerous, better use >

Re: dmake in debian

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:03:25AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > Talking about "mktmp": > I noticed that "/usr/bin/openoffice" still contains use of a temporary > file not using "mktemp" nor "tempfile". > May I submit a patch? What do you think of it? Which one to use, > "mktemp" or "tempfile"?