Re: Problems with OpenOffice.org and gcc-3.1 on PowerPC and perhaps on intel, too! [was: kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca: [dev] question on cppuhelper throwException and double TYPELIB_DANGER_RELEASE]

2002-07-09 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi Jack .. On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:12:08PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > The patch that I have for libgcc-compat causes the code to be built >with or without gcc-3.1 being used for the build. If you are finding >that soffice fails due to an illegal instruction, you might try rebuilding >glibc

Re: Problems with OpenOffice.org and gcc-3.1 on PowerPC and perhaps on intel, too! [was: kevin.hendricks@sympatico.ca: [dev] question on cppuhelper throwException and double TYPELIB_DANGER_RELEASE]

2002-07-09 Thread Jack Howarth
Jan, The patch that I have for libgcc-compat causes the code to be built with or without gcc-3.1 being used for the build. If you are finding that soffice fails due to an illegal instruction, you might try rebuilding glibc 2.2.5 under gcc 2.95.4 and see if that causes the symbols to be resolved.

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by gromitt

2002-07-09 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian who:gromitt time: Tue Jul 9 23:10:28 UTC 2002 Log Message: Enable building prj and libs of OOo with debugging-symbols by setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug debian/rules buildprj , dropping copiing mozlibs into OOo source for PPC, I will link against sys

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by haggai

2002-07-09 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian who:haggai time: Tue Jul 9 19:37:15 UTC 2002 Log Message: openoffice.org (1.0.0-pre1.0.1rc2) experimental; urgency=low * Recompiled against fixed libstlport package * Change user directory to ~/OpenOffice.org1.0.1. Note there is *no suppo

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian/local by haggai

2002-07-09 Thread Debian Openoffice CVS
Repository: oo-deb/debian/local who:haggai time: Tue Jul 9 19:37:15 UTC 2002 Log Message: openoffice.org (1.0.0-pre1.0.1rc2) experimental; urgency=low * Recompiled against fixed libstlport package * Change user directory to ~/OpenOffice.org1.0.1. Note there is *no

Re: Openoffice Package broken

2002-07-09 Thread Chris Halls
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:44:17PM +0200, Markus Baumeister wrote: > probably I'm the 395th who writes but the openoffice.org-bin package > 1.0.0-6 ist broken. It depends on libstlport4.5gcc3 but the respective > package is called libstlport4.5gcc3.0 or libstlport4.5gcc3.1 (under > woody-testing

Re: Update to pre-1 quirks

2002-07-09 Thread Chris Halls
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:10:55PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote: > Am Montag, 8. Juli 2002 18:49 schrieb Malte Cornils: > > I've just tested the new openoffice version (pre-1.1), there are two > > problematic aspects. [...] Only two? :) Sorry, my upload was too early - I discovered them just after