Hi Jack .. On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:12:08PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > The patch that I have for libgcc-compat causes the code to be built >with or without gcc-3.1 being used for the build. If you are finding >that soffice fails due to an illegal instruction, you might try rebuilding >glibc 2.2.5 under gcc 2.95.4 and see if that causes the symbols to be >resolved. I am going to give that a try right now and see if it helps. >If it does provide a solution we can just ask Ben Collins to use >the libgcc-compat patch the next time he does a gcc 2.95.4 build of >glibc 2.2.5 and that should resolve the problems.
you can find the lib I use at http://bourbaki.math.uni-kiel.de/~jpalic/debian/pool/main/l/libc6/ it is usally build with the gcc-2.95 I only added three patches for PPC (allready mailed BenC). Regards Jan -- .''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic | : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,.. `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` ` `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ' ` `
pgpcQVr3Pu8Ah.pgp
Description: PGP signature
