Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:"Richard Braakman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: java
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>En
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Matthias Klose
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Install path for libgcj header files
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: libgcj
>Class: change-request
>Release: 3.1.1 20020703 (Debian prerelease) (
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `java/7304'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: java
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: gcj-3.1 ICE
>Arrival-Date: Sun Jul 14 04:36:01 PDT 2002
--
To UNSUBSC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 152501 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#152501: gcj-3.1: segfault with test case
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 152501 [PR java/7304] gcj-3.1 ICE
Bug#152501: gcj-3.1: segfault with test case
Changed Bug t
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:"Stephane Magnenat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: high
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environm
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c++/7306'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c++
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with
>variable num
Philip Blundell writes:
> The binaries have to be built in some directory, and whatever pathname
> is used will end up embedded in the debug information. There's not a
> lot we can do about this.
therefore closing the repot. adding a paragraph about debugging
libstdc++ for the next upload.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 151357 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151357: gcc-3.0 fails to compile virtual inheritance with variable number
of argument methode
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 151357 [PR c++/7306] gcc-3.x fails to
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148725: gij-3.1, java-runtime2 and libbtools-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 148529 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#148529: gnat-3.1: sin broken
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 148529 [PR ada/6911] gnat-3.1: sin broken
Bug#148529: gnat-3.1: sin broken
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 147864 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#147864: gnat-3.1 fails to compile libgtkada
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 147864 [PR ada/5679] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type, returning
> unconstrained type c
reassign 148664 glibc
thanks
Sean Perry writes:
> Package: g++-3.1
> Version: 1:3.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
> in modern C++ the style is:
>
> #include
> std::assert(this_should_be_true);
>
> however this fails to compile under 3.1 claiming:
>
> parse error before `static_cast'
>
> my code is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 148664 glibc
Bug#148664: g++-3.1: can not compile code with std::assert in it
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.1' to `glibc'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:21:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#151618: g++-3.1: Rope apparently moved out of std.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
severity 150357 wishlist
tags 150357 + wontfix
thanks
Ben Pfaff writes:
> Package: gcc-3.1-doc
> Version: 3.1.1-0pre2
>
> The Info files for GCC 2.95 have names beginning with gcc-295.
> The Info files for GCC 3.0 have names beginning with gcc-300.
> But the Info files for GCC 3.1 have names begi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 150357 wishlist
Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> tags 150357 + wontfix
Bug#150357: gcc-3.1-doc: naming inconsistency
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
reassign 151675 gcc-2.95
tags 151675 + fixed
retitle 151675 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm
thanks
Gerrit Pape writes:
> Package: gcc
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> compiling tryulong32.c on arm with gcc-2.95.2-13.1 and the -O option seems
> to cause an infinite loop in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 151675 gcc-2.95
Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-2.95'.
> tags 151675 + fixed
Bug#151675: gcc: infinite loop with -O on arm
Tags added: fixed
> retitle 151675 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc: infi
> Version 2.95 got it right: This is no valid C++ (What happens if someone
> adds a constructor to the struct?).
While this is indeed not well-formed C++ 98, this is a defect in C++
itself (as it breaks C compatibility). Defect Report 80 (which will be
included in the upcoming technical corrigendu
Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with
variable number of argument methode
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 08:23:28 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. A regression from GCC 2.95.
http://gcc.gnu.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 150966 general
Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `general'.
> tags 150966 + moreinfo
Bug#150966: g++: apt-get install g++ fails and suggests I submit a bug report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 150558 + fixed
Bug#150558: gcc: -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix or operands
invalid for `div'
Tags added: fixed
> retitle 150558 [fixed in gcc-3.1] -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error:
> suffix or operands invalid for `div'
Bug#15
reassign 150966 general
tags 150966 + moreinfo
thanks
you don't give much information. I suspect, this is an error in some
other package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: g++
> Version: N/A
> Severity: normal
>
> Here's my list of installed packages... I'm not sure exactly where the
> proble
tags 150558 + fixed
retitle 150558 [fixed in gcc-3.1] -O3 yields asm code mp.s:9605: Error: suffix
or operands invalid for `div'
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 1:2.95.2-13.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Included are ``mp.i'' and ``mp.c'' which produced the error. The
> pr
yes, some gcc-2.95 uploads were tested against the gcc-3.0 testsuite.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I mailed earlier about the testsuite failing. I've found a similar output
> from somebody else on
> http://kebo.vlsm.org/debian-extra/dists/stable/dhidhel/experimental/gcc-2.95-4/gcc-2.95-2.9
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 143138 kdelibs
Bug#143138: artsd crashes caused by -fomit-frame-pointer !
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kdelibs'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 64832 + fixed
Bug#64832: gcc optimizer bug on m68k
Tags added: fixed
> retitle 64832 [fixed in gcc-3.1] gcc optimizer bug on m68k
Bug#64832: gcc optimizer bug on m68k
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Please could you retry this with the current gcc-3.1 version found in
unstable?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 2:2.95.4-4
> Severity: normal
>
> This one's not easy to diagnose on my end. I'll cut and paste objdump's
> with --source to give an idea of the flavor. Similar bugs
Philip Blundell writes:
> On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 20:26, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > I don't think that a Debian bug report is the right place to "push" a
> > patch into gcc (i.e. to lobby for it).
> >
> > Instead, you should assume that all patches that have been submitted
> > to gcc-patches are im
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 18:33:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#149463: There should be a gcc version with stack
protectionpatch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Synopsis: Regression: gcc-3.x fails to compile virtual inheritance with
variable number of argument methode
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nathan
Responsible-Changed-By: nathan
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 10:59:24 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
working on a patch (implementi
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 06:18:08AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???,
> which was filed against the gnat-3.1-doc package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
>
Eric G. Miller writes:
> > It is included: gnat-rm-3.1
>
> I believe you're mistaken. The gnat-rm covers the implementation
> of portions of the Ada Reference Manual, along with some extensions,
> but it does not actually include the text of the Ada95 Reference Manual.
> Please compare the conten
Petr Vandrovec writes:
> On 12 Jul 02 at 9:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > retitle 151196 [fixed in gcc-3.x] gcc-2.95.4-9 ICE in kernel (matroxfb) code
> > tags 151196 + fixed
> > thanks
>
> My system still runs 'gcc-2.95.4' when I type 'gcc', so how it
> comes that you tag this fixed? I could un
Jean-Yves GUILLEVIC writes:
> Hello All
>
> does someone knows about libffi2 on Debian HPPA Linux ?
> to get a gcj on this port ...
AFAIK nobody has started a port yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jean-Yves GUILLEVIC writes:
> > Hello All
> >
> > does someone knows about libffi2 on Debian HPPA Linux ?
> > to get a gcj on this port ...
>
> AFAIK nobody has started a port yet.
James Mc Parlane may be working on this. There was a question re calling
conventions back on May 17.
Dave
--
J
reassign 150755 ccache
thanks
Michel LESPINASSE writes:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Ok, I didn't work with profiling before. Please could you send me a
> > small example program and a Makefile to show the problem?
>
> Yes. However in the mean time I have
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 150755 ccache
Bug#150755: gcc-3.1: -fprofile-arcs option is broken
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `ccache'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-10_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-10_i386.deb
to
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ARM]
> well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this
> manual ... Sam?
Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or
Laurent Guerby.
The current version of the manual (acutually, it's the ISO Ada
standard
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:32:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146850: fixed in gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds13-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [ARM]
>
>> well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this
>> manual ... Sam?
>
> Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or
> Laurent Guerby.
Laurent Guerby
Florian Weimer writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [ARM]
>
> > well, it's not included in the gcc source. Not sure where Sam got this
> > manual ... Sam?
>
> Someone converted in from the Scribe version, either Sam himself or
> Laurent Guerby.
>
> The current version of the
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The current version of the manual (acutually, it's the ISO Ada
>> standard without the official front page) is available from
>> http://www.ada-auth.org/.
>
> ok, and how did he convert it to info format?
IIRC, Jerry did it by hand, using ad-hoc scrip
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20020714-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot
46 matches
Mail list logo
