> Version 2.95 got it right: This is no valid C++ (What happens if someone > adds a constructor to the struct?).
While this is indeed not well-formed C++ 98, this is a defect in C++ itself (as it breaks C compatibility). Defect Report 80 (which will be included in the upcoming technical corrigendum) restores C compatibility again, and makes your example well-formed; see http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#80 g++ already incorporates the resolution to this issue. The case where a constructor for this class is also present is an entirely different issue (see the DR). Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
