Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rumour says, that there will be one more C++ ABI change to fix bugs
> found after the gcc-3.2 release (maybe for gcc-3.4), and then the C++
> ABI will be stable ...
I believe this is a misprediction of the future. Here is my prediction:
1. The "core"
Florian Weimer writes:
> Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:33:18AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> Please drop shared library support altogether. It is currently not
> >> worth the trouble. GNAT ABIs change from version to version, and the
> >> run-tim
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:33:18AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Please drop shared library support altogether. It is currently not
>> worth the trouble. GNAT ABIs change from version to version, and the
>> run-time library can be built only with th
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:33:18AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Please drop shared library support altogether. It is currently not
> worth the trouble. GNAT ABIs change from version to version, and the
> run-time library can be built only with the corresponding version of
> the compiler. This
Thanks for your work on GNAT. It will be good to have it being maintained on
Debian again.
> I don't see a significant number of small Ada programs in Debian.
True. However there are a significant number of people who do development of
small programs using Debian and who sometimes distribute them
Miah Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This concerns me a little. It seems to my untrained eye that this change
> would mean that we're sacrificing large amounts of space in packages
> compiled with GNAT, just to save rebuilding those packages when a new
> version of GNAT is uploaded? Given th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer writes:
> > Please drop shared library support altogether. It is currently not
> > worth the trouble. GNAT ABIs change from version to version, and the
> > run-time library can be built only with
Florian Weimer writes:
> Please drop shared library support altogether. It is currently not
> worth the trouble. GNAT ABIs change from version to version, and the
> run-time library can be built only with the corresponding version of
> the compiler. This means that a lot of work is required each
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I confess to having made an omission when drawing up the gcc-3.2
> transition plan. I concentrated on C++ and completely ignored other
> languages. I do not know what (if anything) nees to be done for Java
> or Fortran. However, I've done a small amo
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Second problem: dependencies in the debian/control file. They probably
> look something like this:
>
> Build-Depends: gnat (>= 3.14p-1), gnat (<< 3.15)
> and
> Depends: gnat (>= 3.14p-1), gnat (<< 3.15)
>
> What should these look like? I'm tempte
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:36:17AM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Second problem: dependencies in the debian/control file. They probably
> look something like this:
>
> Build-Depends: gnat (>= 3.14p-1), gnat (<< 3.15)
> and
> Depends: gnat (>= 3.14p-1), gnat (<< 3.15)
>
> What should these l
I confess to having made an omission when drawing up the gcc-3.2
transition plan. I concentrated on C++ and completely ignored other
languages. I do not know what (if anything) nees to be done for Java
or Fortran. However, I've done a small amount of investigation on
what needs to be done for A
12 matches
Mail list logo
