Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't think this will work in general because a DSO might expose the
>> layout of objects provided by the standard library in its public
>> interface. That's part of the reason why I think that symbol
>> versioning is way overrated in some circle
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 07:43:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The soname of libstdc++ changed upstream from 3.3. and 3.4, and the
> >> compiler implements a somewhat different flavor of C++ (it's much
> >> closer to the standard now).
> >
>
At Fri, 30 Apr 2004 21:55:48 +0200,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> In the release notes, alpha mips and sparc are listed to have
> changes in the binary ABI, maybe only corner cases.
Yeah, reading through the release notes, it seems there're a bunch of
modifications.
> There are currently too many unkno
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:05:37PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > } Are there any plans how handle the next C++ transition, and when to
> > > }
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The soname of libstdc++ changed upstream from 3.3. and 3.4, and the
>> compiler implements a somewhat different flavor of C++ (it's much
>> closer to the standard now).
>
> However, with symbol versioning and shared libgcc implemented in both
> 3.3
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:05:37PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > } Are there any plans how handle the next C++ transition, and when to
> > } start it?
> >
> > Is there one on the
Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> } Are there any plans how handle the next C++ transition, and when to
> } start it?
>
> Is there one on the horizon? I thought the 3.x series was maintaining
> binary compatibility throu
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
} Are there any plans how handle the next C++ transition, and when to
} start it?
Is there one on the horizon? I thought the 3.x series was maintaining
binary compatibility throughout.
--Greg
8 matches
Mail list logo
