On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:05:37PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:31:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > } Are there any plans how handle the next C++ transition, and when to > > } start it? > > > > Is there one on the horizon? I thought the 3.x series was maintaining > > binary compatibility throughout. > > The soname of libstdc++ changed upstream from 3.3. and 3.4, and the > compiler implements a somewhat different flavor of C++ (it's much > closer to the standard now).
However, with symbol versioning and shared libgcc implemented in both 3.3 and 3.4, I don't think a transition is actually necessary - I believe things will work OK with both versions linked in. For most architectures, at least. Do you have some reason to think this is wrong? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
