Bug#609659: Processed: reassign gij report

2011-01-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:20:56PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> there is #609665 which claims to track it in gij. > #609665 is related to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609657. (which is > marked as blocked by 609665 by Lionel) > This bug is an another bug by Lionel, not

Processed: Re: Bug#609659: Processed: reassign gij report

2011-01-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 609659 gij Bug #609659 [gij] handle gcj linkage error gracefully Ignoring request to reassign bug #609659 to the same package > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 609659: http://bugs.debian.org

Bug#609659: Processed: reassign gij report

2011-01-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 609659 gij thanks On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >This bug is an another bug by Lionel, not (just) about the dependency. Read > >it. > >It requests a fallback to non-native if the mismatch happens. > > which mismatch? The condition causing "libgcj lin

Bug#609659: Processed: reassign gij report

2011-01-11 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign libreoffice-gcj thanks This bug is an another bug by Lionel, not (just) about the dependency. Read it. It requests a fallback to non-native if the mismatch happens. which mismatch? And no, just pointing out libreoffice as a "testcase" is not enough. Please provide a self-contained te