reassign 609659 gij thanks On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >This bug is an another bug by Lionel, not (just) about the dependency. Read > >it. > >It requests a fallback to non-native if the mismatch happens. > > which mismatch?
The condition causing "libgcj linkage errror" > And no, just pointing out libreoffice as a > "testcase" is not enough. Please provide a self-contained testcase > which shows the mismatch. True, but this is not the point of this bug. You confuse this one with 609665. There you are right. For *this* one, everything he wants is "if gij would throw the linkage error, fall back to non-native jars". That is what this bug about, and that surely is not LibOs job, but the job of what uses the .jar.sos when requested to load a .jar - and that's gij. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110111163921.ga21...@rene-engelhard.de
