gcc manual page

2009-09-04 Thread greg
I apologize if this is the wrong place to send my question. Where may I find the gcc manual page? I have installed manpages-dev but, apparently, it is not there. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...

Bug#352493: this bug/#352493: man-db: Dangling symlink

2006-05-26 Thread Greg Kochanski
Justin Pryzby wrote: reassign 352493 java-gcj-compat-dev retitle 352493 rmic.1.gz is a dangling symlink thanks On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:02:56PM +0100, Greg Kochanski wrote: Justin Pryzby wrote: man-db: Dangling symlink http://bugs.debian.org/352493 Hello Greg, Did you ever get around to

Bug#324502: libgcj6-awt: It happens on more than one program

2006-04-08 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: libgcj6-awt Version: 4.0.2-5j2 Followup-For: Bug #324502 When running a data display program called "mirage" from AT&T Research, I get the same error: $ !mir mirage -data foo screen size = 1280 x 1024 (.:28415): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_new: assertion `width > 0' failed ** ER

Bug#300583: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.0: Running /etc/alternatives/java with no arguments segfaults.

2005-03-20 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: gij-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.4-7 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.0 $ /etc/alternatives/java Segmentation fault $ The seg fault happens on the line: exec /usr/bin/gij-3.0 . -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architect

Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
Which seems like an acceptable error message. Unfortunately, it is rather likely that this gets fixed in 3.3, too. How about this variant that defines inverse() ? $ g++ -c bug.c bug.c: In function `void c_area(const xform_split&, const box&, const box&)': bug.c:32: error: parse error before `,'

Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
Falk Hueffner wrote: Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Why is the test case important? Because I cannot reproduce the problem without it. OK. Here is a condensed version. $ g++ -c bug.c bug.c: In function `void c_area(const xform_split&, const box&, const box&)

Bug#293076: g++-3.3 uninformative error when base class missing

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-5 Severity: normal In the following program, the base class is missing. G++ gives a wimpy error message: bug.c:3: error: parse error before `{' token It could do much better. Syntactically, there aren't a lot of options for 'z'. A better error message might

Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
OK. I'll spend an hour or so boiling down a test case. Falk Hueffner wrote: I can see that. However without a test case it is not clear to me whether, or how, g++ could have done better. So I need a test case plus an example error message that you would have liked to see. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
is the language (on the input side) and the error messages (as output)."Parse error after ',' token." is simply not much of a user interface. If I spend a couple of hours boiling down 20 pages of code to a small test case, are you going to think about the user interface issues?

Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
at fixed it, I don't know, but I do know that the compiler's error message didn't help me very much. Falk Hueffner wrote: Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Here's the code: box c_area(C xform_split &xf, C box& databox0, C box& databox1) { // Next

Bug#292961: g++-3.3: g++ -- vastly uninformative error message

2005-01-31 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-5 Severity: normal Having been away from C++ for several years, I've now tried to compile some old (circa 1999) code. The error message geom.c:84: parse error before ',' token (or a dozen variants of it) are completely useless! I note that this problem

Bug#275477: cpp-3.3: /usr/share/doc/cpp contains a looping symbolic link

2004-10-08 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: cpp-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.4-13 Severity: minor /usr/share/doc/cpp/cpp symbolic links to itself. gpk:doc$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/cpp total 12 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Aug 28 11:58 FAQ.gz -> ../gcc-3.3/FAQ.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Aug 28 11:58 README.Bugs -> ../gcc-3.3/README.Bugs -r

Bug#268080: limits.h: Tries to include nonexitent headers linux/errno.h and linux/limits.h

2004-08-25 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.4-6sarge1 Severity: important File: limits.h g++ -D__Linux -I./gpkio -I. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/gpklib -fpic -shared -Wall -g -x c++ -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -O2 -c -o ascii_read.o ascii_read.c In fil

std::string::compare bug

2004-01-21 Thread Greg Martin
.10.0.so libstdc++-libc6.2-2.a.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++.so.3 libstdc++.so.3.0.4 The STL compliant versions of compare are missing when g++ is invoked though they are there when gcc is invoked. I'm looking for some advice before I start changing things. Thanks, Greg Martin

Bug#180315: gij: apt-get remove gij leaves /usr/bin/java and /etc/alternatives/java

2003-02-08 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: gij Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-08 Severity: normal apt-get remove gij does not completely remove all files. Notably, /usr/bin/java remains as a link to /etc/alternatives/java and /etc/alternatives/java calls gij-3.0 -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architectur

Bug#165992: gcc: __builtin_return_address doesn't work properly

2002-10-24 Thread Greg Stark
uiltin can't do the same for me. I must be missing something, how do gdb and other tools happily decode stack traces all the time without crashing? -- greg

Bug#101115: gcc-3.0: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so

2001-06-16 Thread greg
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613 Severity: normal I don't know whether this is a bug in gcc-3.0 or libgcc0: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Jun 15 20:16 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 But there is no /lib/libgcc_s.so.0 file; instead, there

Bug#100166: s3v_dac.i.gz

2001-06-09 Thread Greg Wooledge
Attaching s3v_dac.i.gz s3v_dac.i.gz Description: Binary data

Bug#100166: gcc-3.0: internal compiler error: unrecognized insn

2001-06-08 Thread Greg Wooledge
Debian bug report as well? (It's 57k.) -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | pgpCrgFVE98h9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#100166: gcc-3.0: internal compiler error: unrecognized insn

2001-06-08 Thread greg
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010526 Severity: normal Building XFree86 4.1.0 from source, with gcc-3.0, using the options "-O3 -funroll-loops -march=k6": s3v_dac.c: In function `S3VCommonCalcClock': s3v_dac.c:110: Unrecognizable insn: (insn 585 583 587 (set (reg:SI 212) (zero_extend