please be rolled back until it can be root-caused and fixed?
Cheers,
Daniel
Followup-For: Bug #1015185
Hi,
This is standard behavior with the GCC packages, sadly. See:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894014
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783876
Regards,
Daniel.
=992477
Thank you!
Daniel Lewart
Urbana, Illinois
Also, discussed here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/07/msg00046.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/07/msg00048.html
By the way, buster had:
* gcc-7-base: libs/optional
* gcc-8-base: libs/optional
Thank you!
Daniel Lewart
Urbana, Illinois
Also, discussed here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/07/msg00046.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/07/msg00048.html
Thank you!
Daniel Lewart
Urbana, Illinois
, discussed here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/07/msg00046.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/07/msg00048.html
Thank you!
Daniel Lewart
Urbana, Illinois
is not available.
Best wishes,
Daniel Auth
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64
(x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
S
Package: g++-6
Version: 6.2.0-13
Severity: minor
While developing a custom implementation of std::make_index_sequence
for compatibility with previous versions of gcc, I ran into an
internal compiler error. I'm attaching the output of creduce on the
source code, which still gives the same ICE.
--
[stamps/stamp-configure-static] Error 77
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2
It would be nice if we could get an update to gcc-defaults in
experimental as well.
--
Daniel Schepler
-- debconf-show failed
>From 6ceddcd7b87911ddbb942923722af5a735dacedc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bernds
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:48:26 +
Subject: [PATCH] Ignore -fdebug-prefix-map in producer string (by Daniel Kahn
Gillmor)
* dwarf2out.c (gen_producer_string): Ignore -fdebug-prefix-map.
testsuite/
Package: gcc-5
Version: 5.1.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Currently, gcc-5 packages are really big because the files under
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5 are not stripped, and each one of
lto1, cc1 and cc1plus is about 130MB.
Please, can those files be striped in the default installat
Source: gnat-4.9
Version: 4.9.1-4
Severity: serious
The Build-Depends for gnat-4.9 cannot be satisfied in current unstable because
they include gcc-4.9-source (<< 4.9.2).
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Hi,
could you please consider this patch for the upcoming LTS? I've just
started a thread in the gcc-patches list.
Thanks,
Daniel.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Gutson
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:43 AM
Subject: [PATCH] pedantic warning behavior when casting
0&stamp=1378512744>
for an example of a failed build.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3128912.nBIJ1MDust@frobozz
IONS="parallel=? [nocheck]" dpkg-buildpackage -B -uc
dpkg -i ../g++-4.7_*.deb ../g++-4.7-multilib_*.deb ; resolve dependencies ; \
apt-get check && dpkg --configure -a
Finally, full build of eglibc (with libssp usage compiled into the
appropriate utilities):
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="pa
ed.
I: Copying back the cached apt archive contents
I: unmounting dev/pts filesystem
I: unmounting run/shm filesystem
I: unmounting proc filesystem
I: cleaning the build env
I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//16526 and its subdirectories
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Package: g++
Version: 4:4.6.4-2
Severity: serious
My build fails on SPARC:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=resiprocate&arch=sparc&ver=1.8.12-4&stamp=137847172
MediaResourceParticipant.cxx:341:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with pre
Hi,
I recently built openbabel on eder.d.o using the latest gcc 4.8 and it
built fine. Feel free to close this report if you think, that this error
is solved then.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
If you need any more information, please let me know. I've not yet tested,
if the same error appears with the latest GCC 4.8 suite.
Regards, Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
Architecture: mipsel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v
d a static version for the
bootstrapped pkg-config to link against -- which still requires libffi.
And hopefully the chain above also explains why texinfo isn't available to be
bootstrapped yet at this point.)
--
Daniel Schepler
diff -urN libffi-3.0.13.old/debian/rules libffi-3.0.13/debian/r
;checking for working
mktime" autoconf check was timing out.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cadf0c47m4wjnsi7xxfoxx--wjopskt7ao+paoc8cw3mvx2_...@mail.gmail.com
ild printed
"../lib" on "gcc -print-multi-os-directory", and I didn't immediately
see anything in the 4.7.2-19 changelog that would address this. So I
just wanted to let you know about this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.o
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.120
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 ftbfs-x32
Here's the patch I'm using to add x32 support to gcc-defaults.
--
Daniel Schepler
diff -Nru gcc-defaults-1.120/debian/changelog gcc-defaults-1.120+x32/debian/changel
, actually, I forgot I got multiple messages, and forwarded the one
for gcc-4_6-branch; but the logs for gcc-4_7-branch and trunk look
pretty much the same.)
--
Daniel Schepler
-- Forwarded message --
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:02 AM
Subject: [Bug c
matter which package is installed. So I guess I'll just start working
on adding libc6-x32 and libx32gcc1 packages to the existing structure.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
heezy
releases, of course): With the current situation, anyone who needs
both multiarch libraries and gcc-multilib will necessarily end up with
two copies of 32-bit [e]glibc on their system, libc6-i386 and
libc6:i386. That seems like needless duplication in a fairly common
situation.
--
Daniel Sch
n I'd
like; and I've probably broken non-amd64/i386/x32 architectures with
it. I'm also pretty sure I've missed most places where I'd need to
add x32 multilib support, so it will need more work before it will
build properly on amd64 or i386.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCR
2012 at 5:36 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 17.08.2012 18:12, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>> On a side note, instead of adding libx32gcc1 etc.,
>
> I don't like the idea of having to cros-build-depend on other architectures,
> so
> as a first step, I'd like to see the
ize suffix when dealing with pointers.
* time_t in x32 is 64-bit, which breaks assumptions of a few programs
that sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long).
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
definition.
I've also created a reduced test case, attached.
--
Daniel Schepler
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
typedef long long int64_t;
extern int __isnan (double __value) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ )) __attribute__ ((__const__));
extern __typeof (__isnan) __isnan __asm__ (""
s_isnan.i still fails to build with gcc-4.7 4.7.1-3. I just tried
with gcc-snapshot 20120704-1, and it fails there too.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> How does 4.7.1-2 do?
>
> Curious,
> Jonathan
Still fails.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Source: libffi
Version: 3.0.10-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi, the current 3.0.10 Debian package builds a broken libffi library on x32,
whereas on 3.0.11 it passes the testsuite with no problems. (Although it
would require an soname bump to libffi6.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
p.egr.msu.edu/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cadf0c47xbrnqkuu1597_pjmaaamynxq4kx4xz-www0edm-6...@mail.gmail.com
It's not a bug. I'm really sorry.
The output was
In file included from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:40:0,
from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h:9,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtypes.h:34,
from /usr/include/gli
version, not trying
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.
...
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debia
Package: libmudflap0-4.4-dev
Version: 4.4.5-2
Severity: important
if you look in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4 then there is a symlink called
"libmudflap.so" which points to "../../../libmudflap.so.". There is a zero (0)
missing in the link target.
I corrected the bug my manually erasing the s
(see
http://www.wsinnovations.com/softeng/articles/uds.html "File Descriptor
Passing")
Cheers,
- Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c701657@mathematik.uni-marburg.de
forms != X86 (even though the original author of that
file seemed to assume that, according to his comment) - at least it
wouldn't be more broken than the 4.3 version ;-)
Cheers,
- Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 's
ch addresses the issue.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Iain Buclaw
>
> *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
>
Works for me, too :-)
Cheers,
- Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikin6qcnyy93a1y9sfevaam_takyg-boeyql...@mail.gmail.com
d fix both bugs for me. Great work :-)
On a side note: It seems like the gdc meta-package in squeeze was
updated recently now depends on gdc-4.3 instead of gdc-4.1 - is gdc
4.3 really stable enough to be the default gdc? I just played around
with D for a few days and discovered two bugs, so it s
I just found the following Bugreport in Ubuntu's bugtracker:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdc-4.3/+bug/570913
("Classes nested in functions are not written to object files"), I guess
it's the same bug.
Cheers,
- Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
run,
but if it isn't I'd suggest to change this to
if(state != TS.FINISHED && state != TS.INITIAL)
pthread_detach(id);
This Bug also applies gdc-4.3 and Digitalmars dmd.
I've attached a simple example to demonstrate the bug.
Cheers,
- Daniel
--- System information. ---
A
mous nested classes are a
standard feature of D.
Cheers,
- Daniel
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 testing security.debian.org
500 testing ftp.de.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends
c-4.1 I get the following output:
"900150983CD24FB0D6963F7D28E17F72", when it's built with gdc-4.3 I
get:
"9BB8D85B9EC69BAAE48AFD6DC642C4B7
Error: AssertError Failure md5test.d(8)"
or "73295B9A9D13003D9E6065260759FBD4
Error: AssertError Failure md5test.d(8)"
..
reassign 548842 libstdc++6
found 548842 4.4.1-4
thanks
On 11/23/2009 07:04 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The problem is most probably a non word aligned relocation in the
> program you are trying to run or one of its library. You can list them
> with objdump -R file.
Since armel is a 32-bit machin
I've read up a bit more on the strict-aliasing rules, and now I'm
even more confused. They appear to be mostly about invalid casts
between pointer types. But I'm not casting between pointer types
anywhere near where g++ claims the error is occurring, at least not
explic
I apologize for not having a better example than "compile cwidget" --
I spent some time trying to reproduce this with a simpler batch of code
and was entirely unsuccessful. :-(
Thanks,
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50
stamps/02-patch-stamp-libffi-backport] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
nsatisfiable as it Build-Depends on both classpath-
common and default-jdk-builddep (at least on !alpha).
Wouldn't it make sense to handle this as an alternative, since gcj uses
classpath libraries anyway?
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.o
ed library, as in #536826.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
); \
//} while(0)
int test() {
// doit(3);
return 5;
}
dan...@frobozz:/tmp$ g++ -c -Wall test.cc
test.cc:1:1: warning: multi-line comment
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
The problem is that neither gcj, gcj-jdk, nor java-gcj-compat-dev depends on
gcj-4.3 anymore. An "apt-get install default-jdk-builddep gcj-4.3" works fine
in a chroot. So it should be enough just to add gcj-4.3 as a dependency of
one of those packages.
--
Daniel Schepler
build).
However, with that fixed, I still get the "/usr/bin/gcj not found" error in
numerous packages, including db{,4.5,4.6} and libjaxp1.3-java.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
fault gcj-* instead of the
gcj symlink as its default.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libgcj-common
Version: 1:4.4.0-6
Severity: minor
From the end of the output of "man dh_nativejava":
POD ERRORS
Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained
below:
Around line 47:
You forgot a ’=back’ before ’=head1’
need
to be accommodated?
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.
eclarations would be useful. The libc behavior is an
implementation detail.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/tmp/gcj-4.3/gcj-4.3-4.3.3/build'
s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcj-4.3/gcj-4.3-4.3.3'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave
many (most?) apps
added by debhelper scripts).
However, the patch suggested by Jan is ok. But it will break things as
soon as the dependency path does not provide rebuild-gcj-db.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: serious
I cannot build gnat-4.3 under pbuilder (in sid) because the package Build-
Depends on "gcc-4.3-source (<< 4.3.3)" but the current version of gcc-4.3-
source is 4.3.3-3.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
error exit status 2
The config.log file shows that it's detecting that gnatgcc doesn't exist. So
it appears that gnat-4.3 by itself is insufficient to build the package.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to mention I also need to create multiarch.inc by hand, according to
the code in the gcc-4.3 source package, which is tedious and error-prone.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
igure call and it would handle all that automatically.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ouble* _t1_build_i0i0_1(..)':
t1_build_i0i0.cc:3418: internal compiler error: Aborted
The full log can be seen here:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=psicode;ver=3.3.0-2;arch=arm;stamp=1208556376
Unfortunately I don't have access to an arm machine to give you more
information.
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:39:24AM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 05:51:32PM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
>>> Why can't I take a reference to an rvalue?
>>
>> Because you can't modify rvalues. This
ror suggests that taking a reference is not
possible here.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d::allocator]
I'm pretty sure GCC is correct to refuse this. The result of a cast
is an rvalue, so you can not take a reference to it.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 06:48:54 am Matthias Klose wrote:
> tag 453072 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> please recheck with gcj-4.3.
That's going to be difficult, since glibc has a patch applied to work around
the bug.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
e
in lots of other places in my code, so I'm not quite sure what's going
on. Maybe I just get lucky everywhere else?
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i3
ith an explanation of why.
--
Daniel Schepler
bgcj8-1 instead of libgcj-bc, and then complaining
that libgcj8-1 doesn't have the requisite shlibs entry.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/gcj-4.2-4.2.2/build/i486-linux-gnu/libgomp'
make[3]: *** [all-target-libgomp] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
I can also reproduce this on amd64 using pbuilder.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grow to over 4G
virtual memory before I had to kill it.
Cc to debian-glibc because as I recall, the bug was previously worked around
in glibc, but it seems not to be any more since version 2.7-1.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
nding Recommends in gcc-4.1, it is currently impossible
to satisfy the Recommends for both gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2 simultaneously, which
would conflict with the (proposed?) release goal of making all Recommends
satisfiable within main.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
A larger load of cum means more intense orgasms and also the probability of
becoming multi-orgasmic
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 11:22:13 am Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Schepler writes:
> > It looks like the original bug message didn't get forwarded to
> > debian-gcc, possibly because it included a large preprocessed source
> > file. So I'm sending this follow
Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 15:21 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
>
> > - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable.
>
> If libgcj7-jar or libgcj8-jar are installed, the reported issue occurs
> (with
e/java \
org.apache.xalan.xslt.Process \
-out myfile.html \
-in article.001.xml \
-xsl /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh/html/docbook.xsl
Instead of /usr/bin/java you can of course directly use /usr/bin/gij-4.x
or Sun's java executable.
Regards, Daniel
article.001.xml
n-qt3 (and I don't actually know whether it ever finishes), where
g++-4.1 takes under 2 minutes.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is code compiles with g++-4.1, but fails with g++-4.2 and the snapshot of
g++-4.3 currently in Debian's gcc-snapshot package. My question is: is this
valid code or not?
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gnat
Version: 4.2.0-0
Severity: normal
As the subject says: the version of gnat from experimental Depends on
gnat-4.2, which is nowhere to be found, not even in NEW as far as I can tell.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
s not quite clear whether this should work.
However, it does work with g++-4.1 but not with g++-4.2 or gcc-snapshot.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'sum(std::vector >&)'
frobnitz:/tmp# /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c test.cc
test.cc: In function 'int test()':
test.cc:12: error: no matching function for call to 'sum(std::vector >&)'
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that it
causes zlib to FTBFS because zlib's configure script is badly behaved and
treats any output as an error. I was wondering whether you might know what's
causing this message.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Running "mount" showed this:
/usr/bin/gcc-4.1 on /usr/bin/gcc-4.1 type none (rw,bind)
Perhaps an earlier instance of the upgrade had broken off after creating
this symlink. I manually umounted /usr/bin/gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.1 upgraded
fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1_4.1.2-8
Severity: high
Upgrading fails with the following error:
The following packages will be upgraded:
gcc-4.1
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 256 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/408kB of archives.
After unpacking
m -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070515'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
--
Daniel Schepler
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:23:20PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I see the same behaviour with the gcc-snapshot package.
So it seems. PR 31900 now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:38:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > Sorry I don't think I highlighted the bit I meant.
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > >ware Foundation; with the
quot;,
How can Funding Free Software be an invariant section of the GCC
manual page, when it isn't included?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:16:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:06:38PM -0500, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> > > So what, exactly, is the status of the GFDL and GCC's manpage? I still
> > > insist that no
e is generated from the Texinfo documentation. Accordingly
it is covered by the same license. I don't know what the status of
invariant sections in it is.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: normal
I recently upgraded gcj (and/or ecj?) and now a couple of GDB tests fail.
To see the problem, take this file:
public class jmain
{
public static void main (String[] args)
{
return;
}
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/space/fsf/commit/src/gd
gt;
> I assumed from the changelog that it would be using both, but that
> doesn't seem to be the case.
>
> I think it's just a bug in readelf that it can't deal with the gnu hash.
IIRC it was fixed recently upstream.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBS
problem.
Regards, Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
is there a
reason, why they are not part of package? I didn't find anything
related in the READMEs of gij/gij-4.1.
In case of adding manpages, please be so kind to update the
update-alternatives registration.
Regards, Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers uns
Package: libgnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-19
Followup-For: Bug #401385
Some GDB tests in HEAD are now affected by this problem. From Joel
Brobecker at AdaCore:
I have now checked in a patch in GCC that explains that the GNAT
runtime should not be stripped. Would you mind filing a bug with
the De
ument <>
.
Where do we go from here? If the patch is still an improvement, I'd
suggest including it; I'm not going to have another day to figure out
what's wrong with gjdoc for a while.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
atch. I'm not sure there's any point submitting it upstream
until the ARM libffi bits go; not sure what status on that is.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
diff -Nur debian.orig/patches/libjava-sjlj.dpatch
debian/patches/libjava-sjlj.dpatch
--- debian.orig/patches/libjava-sjlj.dpatch
1 - 100 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
