back port yourself.
false
endif
--
nick black -=- https://nick-black.com
to make an apple pie from scratch,
you need first invent a universe.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
f
Would it be possible to pick up that change?
Nick
ibatomic, if possible,
- probing in C mode, if possible,
- using AC_LINK_IFELSE with a valid test program, or
- something else?
Cheers,
Nick
I'm wrong with this analysis.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ
> size.
>
> Linus
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at
and "invalid use or red zone stack") go
>> hand in hand. But who knows.
>>
>> Anyway, this is not a kernel bug. This is your compiler creating
>> completely broken code. We may need to add a warning to make sure
>> nobody compiles with gcc-4.9.0, and the Deb
OS1
ii libgmp-dev 2:5.1.1-SprezzOS1
ii libisl-dev 0.11.1-SprezzOS1
libcloog-isl-dev recommends no packages.
libcloog-isl-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
>From 7137f7b0d450269339a41d02bfbe75cc92e2f8e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: nick black
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 20
I can confirm this bug with gcc-4.4, version 4.4.5-10 from unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d180870.2010...@aevum.de
On 20 October 2010 21:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 21.10.2010 01:43, Nick Lewycky wrote:
>
>> Package: g++-4.4
>> Version: 4.4.5-4
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>> This version of gcc has a bug where code that does a shift-right
>> by literal
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01070.html
which has already been accepted into gcc head, but I didn't see it get
applied
to the release branches. Please add this patch as a debian-local change.
Thanks!
Nick Lewycky
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefer
Package: libffi-dev
Version: 3.0.7-1
Severity: important
It seems that libffi-dev puts ffi.h in a target-specific directory on each
platform. For example, on my system it's in /usr/include/i486-linux-gnu/ which
is a directory that is used by absolutely no other package in Debian.
Notably, gcc doe
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-6
Severity: normal
The attached delta-reduced code crashes GCC 4.3 with -O1, but not -O0 or GCC
4.2.4 (Debian 4.2.4-3).
# gcc-4.3 000.c -c -O1
000.c: In function ‘_ov_64_seek_lap’:
000.c:33: internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-c
close 491653
thanks
Hi Bastian,
You're right again, this is entirely due to the effects of strict
aliasing rules. The problem goes away with -fno-strict-aliasing.
Nick
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:14:10PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
This testcase produces diff
r the trouble.
Nick
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:32:28PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
In C99, _Bool is required to map to one of the unsigned types (6.2.5/6).
Please quote the standard. I read something different there.
However, GCC rejects the following (admittedly unet
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-6
Severity: normal
In C99, _Bool is required to map to one of the unsigned types (6.2.5/6). On
i586, this is 'unsigned char', by ABI. That means that you get eight bits to
the _Bool.
However, GCC rejects the following (admittedly unethical) snippet:
struct S7 {
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-6
Severity: normal
This testcase produces different output depending on whether -O1 or -O2 is
specified. Correct:
# gcc PR1386.c -o pr1386 -O1
PR1386.c: In function ‘main’:
PR1386.c:15: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned typ
freexxx
www girlsoffer cn
Erwin
asserts bluchers snorted everywhereness
perfection outserving slashy
Carlson corbina sleeper priority
bladder rewakens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reakage without an associated so-version bump.
Nick Lewycky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urprised.
Anyways, running the modern ldconfig fixes my problem and allows the
apps to find the proper libraries. Sorry for the confusion.
Thanks,
Nick Lewycky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Does /etc/ld.so.nohwcap exist? What happens if you (re)move it?
No it doesn't. I do have an /etc/ld.so.hwcappkgs, if that's related. It
contains:
libc6 2.3.6-5
libc6-i686 2.3.6-5
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
bug
go away:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib/tls
/lib/tls isn't in my /etc/ld.so.conf. Should it be? When did that
change? And what about the subdirectories under /lib/tls? What package
is supposed to install/own/update the ld.so.conf?
Nick Lewycky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
. That would
explain its non-deterministic nature. Valgrind output also attached.
Nick Lewycky
demo.ld.bz2
Description: Unix tar archive
demo.valgrind.bz2
Description: Unix tar archive
severity 361024 critical
thanks dude
Justification: breaks unrelated software
This bug is causing total breakage of apt-show-versions. It's also
causing problems with dia and gnucash (unable to load plugins written in
C++) and possibly other software in the archive.
Nick Lewycky
-
--
nick at ilm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|nick at ilm dot com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- You are receiving
Package: g++
Version: g++-3.3_1%3a3.3.4-6sarge1.1_i386
Severity: important
Upon doing an apt-get dist-upgrade on my debian 3.1 (testing) system I get
this:
Preparing to replace g++-3.3 1:3.3.4-6sarge1 (using
.../g++-3.3_1%3a3.3.4-6sarge1.1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement g++-3.3 ...
dpkg: err
Package: gcc
Version: gcc-3.3_1%3a3.3.4-6sarge1.1_i386.deb
Severity: important
Upon doing an apt-get dist-upgrade on my debian 3.1 (testing) system I get
this:
Preparing to replace gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-6sarge1 (using
.../gcc-3.3_1%3a3.3.4-6sarge1.1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gcc-3.3 ...
dpkg:
Thanks for the help everyone... on to the essay.
From: Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nick Burkett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: libstdc++... Help please
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:28:53 +0800
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:02:38PM +, Nick Burkett wrote:
&
professional domain.
All of them are entirely unused and fresh!
Click here for a full list!
Memorable
Specialised
Professional
Exclusive
Of course, please feel free to contact me directly with any questions.
Best regards,
Nick
Nick Thomas
VP, Marketing
[EMAIL PROTECTED
> 2.2.19 with current kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k fails with 2.95.2, so there
Can you tell me which version you call current? Have you tried
kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k_2.2.19-3? I thought I had fixed the missing
__muldi3 symbol problem.
N
29 matches
Mail list logo
