Package:gcc-4.7-base
Version: 4.7.1-9
Severity: serious
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
python-wicd wicd wicd-curses wicd-daemon wicd-gtk
The following packages will be upgraded:
cpp-4.7 g++-4.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> Closing as per info from Jorgen.
But he didn't even test the bug. It works fine with no options, but
with the options given in the bug report, -O2 -gnatN, it fails.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian
Package: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-2
Severity: normal
I found a GNAT bug box when recompiling my code. It worked in previous
versions; I'm not sure exactly what, but whatever was current in
Debian a year ago compiled the program this bug was simplified from
fine.
***
~/Code/Dragon_Chess
Package: gnat-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre1
Severity: important
gcc-3.3 -c -O3 -fprofile-arcs drgnchss.adb
gcc-3.3: installation problem, cannot exec `gnat1': No such file or
directory
That's because it's looking in the /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.2
directory, not the 3.3.3 directory. So depende
Package: gnat-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre1
Severity: normal
This is where I gave up on narrowing it down.
--*---*---*-
-*-*-*-*-*-*
-*-*-*-*-*-*
--*---*---*-
is what it should look like,
--*---*-
-*-*-*-*-*-*
--
extraordinary well. But it doesn't work
> around the bugs of other packages, in this case the flaky symlink handling
> of update-alternatives.
At the current time, they aren't bugs in other packages, as no other
package has an obligation to work when a file in /usr/share/man or
/u
d according to the
> > instructions.
>
> The instructions now have a clear "here be dragons" in them.
Again, adding a "here be dragons" to the instructions is a copout. There
is no way to use localepurge without running the risk of breaking other
programs.
--
David
e deleted
with impunity. If localepurge should not be used ("don't do that then"),
then it should not be in the distribution. If it is in the distribution,
then it must work when used according to the instructions.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's not a habit; it'
e
problems with it. You can download and compile GCC 3.1 from source
<http://gcc.gnu.org>, or you download preliminary packages from
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc> to try it out.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive.
I
Sorry, Matthias Klose seems to have taken down the GCC 3.1 packages.
Still, it's not that hard to compile from source.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive.
If you don't have it you're on the other side."
- K&
e else has
proposed, much written, a simple alternative to it. At the very least,
woody shouldn't release with this problem; since it's intractable to fix
in apt-localepurge, and trivial here, why not fix it here?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's not a habit; it's
> Is there a small package with Ada source packaged for Debian, which
> can be used as a test case? Maybe not hello-world, but something with
> more than one module.
music123 should work fine for that. The last release was about 1000
lines of code.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.0, gcc-2.95
and gcc-3.0-base?
It shouldn't be a conflict between packages. It's possible that your
source.lists is messed up. Have you tried apt-get update; apt-get upgrade
recently?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill
n't work. But don't just whine
about it; that helps no one.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:27:14PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Package: gcc-3.0
> > Version: 3.0.1-0pre010723
> >
> > Hi,
> > gcc-3.0.1 contains some really unreasonable default
for -flimit-inline -
> > probably something around 100, but I did not look
At 08:34 PM 05/20/2001 +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
> X-no-Archive: yes
Please don't send messages to these lists with X-no-Archive: yes.
Both of these lists are archived, and such a practice is necessary
for open development. If you don't want it archived, don't send it
ht, and there is no
specified answer. You're modifying x and y in the same line where
you use x and y. That's nasal demon area, and the compiler can do
whatever it wants on this code and still be standards complaint.
I don't think I can close bug, since I'm not one of the gcc
e the chill frontend to
no longer use obstacks.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
Package: gcc-3.0-base
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
Severity: wishlist
The section quoting the standard part 4.4/4 uses the soft hyphen at
several places. Why, I don't understand; it seems like a hyphen is
called for, not the ambigiously non-graphic soft hyphen. However,
not all character sets have
19 matches
Mail list logo
