--- Comment #21 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-23 06:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=17682)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17682&action=view)
glibc-no-long-double-math.patch
I agree that even for __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH we should provide *l prototypes
(cer
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |boehm-gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39833
---
--- Comment #20 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-22 23:34
---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4
in libstdc++ not exported anymore
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote:
> > From glibc's perspective there is no suc
--- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-22
23:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++
not exported anymore
> Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I should have been. The glibc port for
> hppa has always been configured ne
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 23:06
---
Fixed in 4.3.0 by the new register allocator (IRA).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #18 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-22 22:42
---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4
in libstdc++ not exported anymore
>> * Original submitter is incorrect, there has never been a
>> __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 symbol, and there should n
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #524424
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR39814
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertag
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-22
19:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++
not exported anymore
> * Original submitter is incorrect, there has never been a
> __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 symbol, and there sho
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
--- You
--- Comment #16 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2009-04-22 18:33
---
So what is required to close this issue?
* Original submitter is incorrect, there has never been a
__signb...@glibcxx_3.4 symbol, and there should not be one now?
* glibc on hppa-linux-gnu has never had a __signb
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 14:34 ---
Well, double double is IMHO really very problematic format, but only powerpc*
switched to it. alpha, s390* and sparc* use standard IEEE quad long double.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
---
--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-22
13:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 regression] symbol __signb...@glibcxx_3.4 in libstdc++
not exported anymore
> --- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:12
> ---
> If hppa-linux has l
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 09:12 ---
If hppa-linux has long double the same as double (which raises the question why
it hasn't switched over to 128-bit long double together with
powerpc*/sparc*/s390*/alpha back in 2006), then __NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH should
Accepted:
cpp-4.4_4.4.0-1~exp1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.4/cpp-4.4_4.4.0-1~exp1_i386.deb
cpp-4.4_4.4.0-1~exp1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.4/cpp-4.4_4.4.0-1~exp1_powerpc.deb
fixincludes_4.4.0-1~exp1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.4/fixincludes_4.4.0-1~exp1_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.4.0-1
gcc-4.4_4.4.0-1~exp1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gobjc++-4.4_4.4.0-1~exp1_powerpc.deb
lib64objc2_4.4.0-1~exp1_i386.deb
libmudflap0-4.4-dev_4.4.0-1~exp1_powerpc.deb
gcc-4.4-base_4.4.0-1~exp1_powerpc.deb
protoize_4.4.0-1~exp1_i386.deb
lib64gomp1-
15 matches
Mail list logo
