Bug#405937: exception/segmentation fault when trying to process an XML document with Xalan2/Xerces

2007-07-23 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 15:21 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > > > - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable. > > If libgcj7-jar or libgcj8-jar are installed, the reported issue occurs > (with java|gij-4.1|gij-4.2). Remo

[Bug fortran/31639] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in gfc_conv_constant, at fortran/trans-const.c:348 with len

2007-07-23 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 20:45 --- Closing again. The orginal testcase is now correctly handled for all standards. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/31639] [4.1/4.2/4.3] ICE in gfc_conv_constant, at fortran/trans-const.c:348 with len

2007-07-23 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 20:35 --- Subject: Bug 31639 Author: dfranke Date: Mon Jul 23 20:35:03 2007 New Revision: 126858 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126858 Log: gcc/fortran: 2007-07-23 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug target/32853] [4.3 regression] failing libjava testcases

2007-07-23 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3

[Bug java/32862] bug in EnumMap implementation

2007-07-23 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 16:11 --- I have a fix I'm testing. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Ass

gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.2/gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gij-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb

Processing of gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.changes

2007-07-23 Thread Archive Administrator
gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.2-base_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gcj-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gij-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-0_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-0-awt_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb gappletviewer-4.2_4.2.1-0_alpha.deb libgcj8-dev_4.2.1-0

Bug#405937: exception/segmentation fault when trying to process an XML document with Xalan2/Xerces

2007-07-23 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, den 23.07.2007, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose: > - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable. If libgcj7-jar or libgcj8-jar are installed, the reported issue occurs (with java|gij-4.1|gij-4.2). Removing these packages makes the command work. > - please provide a testcase

[Bug cp-tools/32864] keytool is not compatible with sun-java5 keytool

2007-07-23 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
-- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debia

Bug#377210: Re[2]: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Sergey Nivarov writes: > > > > tag 377210 + moreinfo > > thanks > > > > Please could you recheck with the current g++-4.2 from unstable, and > > with gcc-snapshot (from unstable as well). > > > > Ok, installed g++-4.2 as you asked - in my etch did 'apt-get install g++-4.2' > and it also instal

Bug#377210: Re[2]: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect

2007-07-23 Thread Sergey Nivarov
> > tag 377210 + moreinfo > thanks > > Please could you recheck with the current g++-4.2 from unstable, and > with gcc-snapshot (from unstable as well). > Ok, installed g++-4.2 as you asked - in my etch did 'apt-get install g++-4.2' and it also installed dependencies: libc6, binutils, removed

Bug#433629: gcc-4.2: breaks linux kernel usbhid

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 433629 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc 4.2.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#433629: gcc-4.2: breaks linux kernel usbhid

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433629 + moreinfo Bug#433629: gcc-4.2: breaks linux kernel usbhid There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Processed: forwarded gcj report

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 399833 gij-4.2 Bug#399833: libgcj8: JLabel.setCursor does not work Bug reassigned from package `libgcj8' to `gij-4.2'. > tag 399833 + upstream Bug#399833: libgcj8: JLabel.setCursor does not work There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream >

Bug#432489: marked as done (gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many memory references for `lea')

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:25:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many memory references for `lea' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#431045: marked as done (g++-4.2: Template arguments to template functions not working)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:20:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#431045: Question about validity of wfmath template code has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: merge gcc-defaults report

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 427442 minor Bug#427442: /usr/share/doc/libgcj-common/changelog.Debian.gz overwrites gcj-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > merge 427442 396583 Bug#396583: libgcj-common: Link to gcj-4.1-base makes checksums

Bug#421252: lapack build problem

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
see the recent threads on debian-toolchain about migrating from g77 to gfortran. B. Lazarov writes: > > Package: gfortran > Version: 4.1.1-21 > > When I try to compile lapack 3.1.1 from netlib I am getting serious errors in > the testing routines. These problems does not exists in SUSE 10.

Processed: Re: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 377210 + moreinfo Bug#377210: g++: std::basic_filebuf::pubseekoff works incorrect on amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Processed: Re: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 414178 + moreinfo Bug#414178: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#414332: marked as done (fail to build madwifi with gcc 4.1)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:01:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414332: fail to build madwifi with gcc 4.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#419508: marked as done (/usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib32/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib32/libc.a(errno.o)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:02:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line /usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition ... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#393275: -O2 on Alpha makes code crash

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 393275 + moreinfo thanks Please recheck with g++-4.1, g++-4.2 and gcc-snapshot from unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#414178: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 414178 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with g++-4.1, g++-4.2, gcc-snapshot from unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#123468: SOFTWARE SUITE

2007-07-23 Thread Jesse
Have you ever wanted a costly Watch? We have the problem solved for you! We have all the top quality for a very small fraction of the expense. www.weggtre.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377210: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 377210 + moreinfo thanks Please could you recheck with the current g++-4.2 from unstable, and with gcc-snapshot (from unstable as well). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#398129: marked as done ([fixed in 4.2] keytool fails where keytool from sun java 1.5 works)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:33:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gkeytool fails where keytool from sun java 1.5 works has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 418358 gij-4.1 Bug#418358: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup Bug reassigned from package `libhsqldb-java' to `gij-4.1'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

[Bug classpath/32861] SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException

2007-07-23 Thread dog at gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dog at gnu dot org 2007-07-23 08:07 --- Hi Mark, this shouldn't be in the inetlib component, please reassign to whoever is dealing with NIO. -- dog at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Bug#427677: gcj-4.1: rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 427677 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcj-4.2 from unstable. Marcus Better writes: > Package: gcj-4.1 > Version: 4.1.2-8 > Severity: normal > > rmic fails with the following error: > > ~$ grmic-4.1 -d classes/core -classpath > /home/marcus/src/debian/build-area/libmx4j-java-3.0.2/cl

Processed: Re: Bug#427677: gcj-4.1: rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 427677 + moreinfo Bug#427677: gcj-4.1: rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (

Processed: forwarded gcj report

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 423160 + upstream Bug#423160: gij-4.1: bug in EnumMap implementation There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 423160 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32862 Bug#423160: gij-4.1: bug in EnumMap implementation Noted your statement that Bug has bee

Bug#433051: gappletviewer-4.1: Takes up all available memory and CPU cycles and does nothing

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
May be related to http://bugs.debian.org/433391 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#433636: needs validation with gij-4.1 and gij-4.2 from unstable

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 433636 + moreinfo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: needs validation with gij-4.1 and gij-4.2 from unstable

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 433636 + moreinfo Bug#433636: gcj-4.1: java.util.Calendar.setTimeZone fails to set ZONE_OFFSET There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#426739: marked as done (gcj-4.1: FTBFS: undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url')

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:49:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426739: gcj-4.1: FTBFS: undefined reference to `debian_bug_report_url' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#426742: gcj-4.1: FTBFS: "/usr/bin/ld: gnu/java/: No such file"

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 426742 + moreinfo thanks please update and recheck for gcj-4.2. if debuild doesn't work, maybe just use dpkg-buildpackage? Marcus Better writes: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > works for me. > > Strange. > > The attached patch is supposed to fix a bug triggered by jsvc (needed for > Tomcat). I

Processed: tag gcj reports

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 422569 + upstream Bug#422569: gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits "line 0" There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 422569 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31900 Bug#422569: gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits "line 0" Noted your statement that Bug has bee

Bug#415110: marked as done (/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SocketChannel.get(ByteBuffer) does not detect EOF on a non-blocking socket)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:29:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415110: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SocketChannel.get(ByteBuffer) does not detect EOF on a non-blocking socket has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#418358: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 418358 libhsqldb-java thanks not a bug in gij-4.1. gij-4.1 recommends libgcj7-1-awt which contains the graphical toolkit. it is not a dependency so that the jvm can be installed without dependencies on X. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Processed: Re: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 418358 libhsqldb-java Bug#418358: libhsqldb-java: hsqldb-databasemanager throws exception on startup Bug reassigned from package `gij-4.1' to `libhsqldb-java'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debi

Processed: Re: Bug#415109: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 415109 + upstream Bug#415109: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.1: SelectableChannel.configureBlocking fails to throw IllegalBlockingModeException There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 415109 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32861 Bug#415109: /usr/bin

Bug#414983: marked as done (gcj-4.1: Compilation bug with java.awt.Component.x)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:19:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#414983: gcj-4.1: Compilation bug with java.awt.Component.x has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#405937: exception/segmentation fault when trying to process an XML document with Xalan2/Xerces

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Klose
tag 405937 + moreinfo thanks - please recheck with gij-4.1/gij-4.2 from unstable. - please provide a testcase -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#404989: marked as done (gij-4.1: System.nanoTime() goes backwards)

2007-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:14:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gij-4.1: System.nanoTime() goes backwards has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n