Bug#342805: marked as done (libstdc++6-0 missing symlink to libstdc++.so.6 (ARM))

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 01:53:16 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libstdc++6-0 missing symlink to libstdc++.so.6 (ARM) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Re: please configure gcc-3.4 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 347817 + wontfix Bug#347817: please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686 There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#343511: marked as done (g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 02:05:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#341331: FTBFS for cross compilation

Nikita, still interested in fixing that for 3.4, or should we close that as wontfix? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347817: marked as done (please configure gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 01:50:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line please configure gcc-3.4 on i386 with --with-arch=i486 --with-tune=i686 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#367674: gfortran-4.1: uninstallable on Sid due to dependency problems

On 5/26/06, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: works for me; please make sure that your mirror is up to date, elsetry to find out why it's uninstallable. dselect might help to findthat out.There is some problem which I am not able to pin point. I am using uptodate mirrors. I tried using dsel

Bug#353732: marked as done (libg2c0-dev: unable to compile 64bit binary with g77-3.4)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 01:21:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353732: libg2c0-dev: unable to compile 64bit binary with g77-3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#368477: marked as done (gcc-4.0 should depend on libc6-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 00:53:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368477: gcc-4.0 should NOT depend on libc6-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#368715: marked as done (libgcc1 missing in amd64 testing)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 00:08:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#368715: libgcc1 missing in amd64 testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#366873: gcc-4.1-source: patch for cross compiler doesn't apply

Jonas Meyer writes: > Package: gcc-4.1-source > Severity: normal > > > cross-configure.dpatch doesn't apply when following the instructions in > README.cross. > Indeed building according to README.cross doesn't work, because those > patches don't apply. However, when simply skipping them, the

Bug#367674: marked as done (gfortran-4.1: uninstallable on Sid due to dependency problems)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2006 00:21:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367674: gfortran-4.1: uninstallable on Sid due to dependency problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#367595: gcc-4.1:Disable Ada for m32r

Kazuhiro Inaoka writes: > Package:gcc-4.1 > Version:4.1.0-4 > Severity:wishlist > > Please disable Ada for m32r in debian/rules.defs. please attach a patch; I assume this some embedded target. All other languages should be built? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#366744: GNAT is not mentioned in its copyright file

Ludovic Brenta writes: > +Java: > +fastjar Jar creation utility the package names are missing (although built from gcj-4.1); biarch packages are missing as well. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Bug#368569: debian-testing - fastjar - error when installing the package

unreproducible. does /usr/share/info/dir exist? If yes, pleae recheck with debian-only apt resources. Jan Staniek writes: > Package: fastjar > Version: 1:4.1.0-4 > > Hello, > when I upgraded some days ago my system (debian-testing) apt-get reported an > error while installing the package fastjar

Bug#352493: this bug/#352493: man-db: Dangling symlink

Justin Pryzby wrote: reassign 352493 java-gcj-compat-dev retitle 352493 rmic.1.gz is a dangling symlink thanks On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:02:56PM +0100, Greg Kochanski wrote: Justin Pryzby wrote: man-db: Dangling symlink http://bugs.debian.org/352493 Hello Greg, Did you ever get around to

Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense

Package: libgcj6-dev Version: 4.0.2-5j2 Severity: normal This package installs jni.h in /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include/. This only works if you happen to use gcc 4.0.3 to compile the C program you're dealing with, but my gcc thinks it's version 4.0.4: $ gcc -print-search-dirs install: