Re: Bug#335578: ocamlopt.opt segfaults on Alpha

2005-11-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 7, 2005 at 18:34:54 +, Sven Luther wrote: > binutils is the likely culprit, i would say, especially given the way ocamlopt > fails, and the fact that it was a cvs snapshot only augments that fear. > > Julien, could you maybe try downgrading to the older binutils version, and > se

Bug#331150: marked as done ([m68k] gcc segfaults with -g -fomit-frame-pointer)

2005-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:41:11 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101

2005-11-07 Thread buytenh at wantstofly dot org
-- buytenh at wantstofly dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buytenh at wantstofly dot |

Bug#323792: marked as done ([PR23458] [m68k] ICE when compiling freesci)

2005-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:24:01 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101

2005-11-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 19:35 --- This is a bug in the generic thunk support; it doesn't show up on x86 because it uses asm thunks. Continuing to investigate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21123 --- You are receiving this m

Processed: tagging gcc reports

2005-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 336463 + pending Bug#336463: Floating point exception ICE on mips and mipsel Tags were: fixed-upstream patch Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways. Tags added: pending > tags 330857 + pending Bug#330857: segmentation fault compi

[Bug c++/21123] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101

2005-11-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

Re: Bug#335578: ocamlopt.opt segfaults on Alpha

2005-11-07 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:16:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > Starting from ocaml version 3.08.3-8, ocamlopt.opt doesn't work at all > on alpha. Since 3.08.3-7 built fine, I think this is a toolchain issue. > > 3.08.3-7 was built with gcc-4.0 4.0.1-4, binutils 2.16.1-2 and > libc6.1-

Bug#335578: ocamlopt.opt segfaults on Alpha

2005-11-07 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, Starting from ocaml version 3.08.3-8, ocamlopt.opt doesn't work at all on alpha. Since 3.08.3-7 built fine, I think this is a toolchain issue. 3.08.3-7 was built with gcc-4.0 4.0.1-4, binutils 2.16.1-2 and libc6.1-dev 2.3.5-3, while 3.08.3-8 was built with gcc-4.0 4.0.1-6, binutils 2.16.1cvs

Processed: Forwarded upstream

2005-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 336114 +upstream Bug#336114: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible changes There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 336114 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712 Bug#336114: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible change

Bug#336114: Forwarded upstream

2005-11-07 Thread Nathanael Nerode
tags 336114 +upstream forwarded 336114 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712 thanks Forwarded upstream as GCC bug number 24712. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

[Bug rtl-optimization/23567] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] if-conversion causes wrong code

2005-11-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 13:17 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNE

Processed: email-address update

2005-11-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 337713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#337713: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Kernel panic "Fatal exception in interrupt" Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 337713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#337713: linux-image-2.6.14-1-k7: Kernel panic "Fatal exception

Bug#336915: email-address update

2005-11-07 Thread Török Edvin
owner 337713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 337713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner 336915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 336915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner 320784 [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 320784 [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner 336094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 336094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks This is my new email address

[Bug rtl-optimization/23567] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] if-conversion causes wrong code

2005-11-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 08:28 --- Subject: Bug 23567 Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 7 08:28:01 2005 New Revision: 106586 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106586 Log: PR rtl-optimization/23567 * ifcvt.c (noce_mem_wr

[Bug rtl-optimization/23567] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] if-conversion causes wrong code

2005-11-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 08:02 --- Subject: Bug 23567 Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 7 08:01:54 2005 New Revision: 106585 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106585 Log: PR rtl-optimization/23567 * ifcvt.c (noce_mem_wri