Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:41:11 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 21:53:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 14:53:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-bzn-4-str-82-250-109-164.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org) 
[82.250.109.164] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ELpIV-00077R-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:53:35 -0700
Received: from bill by yellowpig.yi.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1ELpHj-0006T7-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 23:52:47 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 23:52:47 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [m68k] gcc segfaults with -g -fomit-frame-pointer
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-9

Hello gcc maintainers,
gcc segfault on m68k with when used with -fomit-frame-pointer -g:

crest% cc -c -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -o kernel.o kernel.i
In file included from ../src/headers/pari.h:95,
                 from ../src/kernel/none/level0.c:18:
./pariinl.h: In function 'addllx':
./pariinl.h:70: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
see <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs>.

The file kernel.i is available here:
<http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/kernel.i>

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331150-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 20:41:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 12:41:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.66] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EZDoQ-00057k-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:41:54 -0800
Received: from ibm61aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113])
          by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:23 -0500
Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm61aec.bellsouth.net
          with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:41:23 -0500
Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2])
        by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2F51771D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  7 Nov 2005 14:41:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1])
        by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6952E3594E
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  7 Nov 2005 14:41:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 03336-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:41:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 4ACA73594D; Mon,  7 Nov 2005 14:41:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 56A6F130485; Mon,  7 Nov 2005 14:41:11 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:41:11 -0600
From: Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-3

I have confirmed that this bug is fixed in gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.

--=20
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDb7vnVKM4J7YoSbMRAparAJ93GaJ4CrBVO8syov/tu5rjil4AXwCfUIKC
a+sm4LbDjWmbKxVpnzS17qc=
=H/Xa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to