Are You Ready?
We are accepting mortgage requests.
You don't have good credit history? That's not a problem!
The approval system it's very fast and simple.
Go to the link below right now.
http://www.1ncr3dible.net/totally.asp
Best Regards,
Emil Schwartz
PS: If you are not interested in thi
The tech edge is here.
http://SYluWZhxhzi2r6y5rm3mvk135k.colagicola5.com/?gnubkhpifis
Seymour
Steve Langasek writes:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Content-Description: message body text
> > I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing:
>
> > gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
>
> > * Disable r
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We sel
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 21:20
---
Actually, I have a much better idea, that I'm testing right now: no need for
complex template-based tricks (in this case, at variance with the case of
classification macros, we *know* the type of the arguments!): l
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] |[3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE
|ICE in output_operand: |in output_operand: invalid
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:47:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > which 4.0 and 4.1 versions did you test?
> >
> > OK, I checked gcc-snapshot on arm (still 4.0.0 20050110-1, unfortunately)
> > and it fix _that_ bug.
> >
> > Sorry I should have tried that sooner,
>
> gcc-4.0 from experimental
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:01:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Bill Allombert writes:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > can you still reproduce this? (Apparently, upstream can't
> > > (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19008).) How about newer gcc?
> >
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-05-22 19:25
---
I posted a patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01956.html
to implement this in the RTL optimizers. Better to get it linked to the PR,
than slip through the cracks. The proposed change to no
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you still reproduce this? (Apparently, upstream can't
> > (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19008).) How about newer gcc?
>
> Hello Falk
>
> Upstream didn't claim they tried to reproduce the bug, that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 284777 g++-4.0
Bug#284777: [PR 19004] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE in uses_template_parms at
cp/pt.c:4860
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.4' to `g++-4.0'.
> reassign 276843 gcc-4.0
Bug#276843: [PR 18588] -O2 disables warning "control reaches e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 285238 - moreinfo
Bug#285238: [PR 19008] [3.3 regression] [arm] gcc-3.3 -O3 -fPIC produce wrong
code via auto inlining
Tags were: moreinfo upstream
Tags removed: moreinfo
> tags 285238 + fixed-upstream
Bug#285238: [PR 19008] [3.3 regression] [arm
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you still reproduce this? (Apparently, upstream can't
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19008).) How about newer gcc?
Hello Falk
Upstream didn't claim they tried to reproduce the bug, that would
involve actually running the code.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-22
16:08 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 19:07:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
tags 309210 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
how can this problem be reproduced? Can you make a stand-alone
testcase?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 309210 + moreinfo
Bug#309210: gcc-4.0 miscompile PARI/GP on x86
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
wim delvaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How so ? Are they on by default ?
Yes.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 262934 + fixed-upstream
Bug#262934: [PR 17218] unknown subjects in generated libstdc++ manpages
Tags were: upstream experimental
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> retitle 262934 [fixed in 4.0] unknown subjects in generated libstdc++ manpages
Bug#262934
How so ? Are they on by default ?
On Sunday 22 May 2005 17:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #307870: gcc-3.4: cc1plus no longer supports strict-prototypes and
> missing-prototypes for C++, which was filed against the gcc-3.4 pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 291405 gcc-doc
Bug#291405: libstdc++3-doc: please provide doxygen tags file along with the
html files
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++3-doc' to `gcc-doc'.
> tags 307993 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#307993: CE in gen_subprogram_die at d
The Only Clinically Tested Penis En_Largement Products!
- Guuaarantee 1+ inches in 2 months (or moneeyy back)
- Experience Longer Lasting and More Enjoying Seexx
- Easy to Wear With No Additional Exercises Require
- The More You Wear, the Longer It Will Be
- Millions of People are Enjoying the Be
tags 275023 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
this is most likely spurious. Can you please read the valgrind hints
at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/debug.html and retry?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
tags 272599 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I cannot reproduce this with 3.4.3-13 (I get a bunch of errors instead
of a segfault). Can you still reproduce it?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 268920 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
we need the source to reproduce this.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 275023 + moreinfo
Bug#275023: g++-3.4: valgrind reports vectors don't free their memory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 272599 + moreinfo
Bug#272599: gcj-3.4: compiling google api demo crashes compiler
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 17:05:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307870: cc1plus no longer supports strict-prototypes and
missing-prototypes for C++
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 268920 + moreinfo
Bug#268920: gij-3.4: segfault with ant
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 240550 libgcj6
Bug#240550: [PR 14759] ServerSocketChannel causes Selector.select() to return
immediatly
Bug reassigned from package `libgcj4' to `libgcj6'.
> reassign 161432 gcc-4.0
Bug#161432: [PR target/8603] Alpha: s?addl pattern doesn't w
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 16:03:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216209: confusing error message for reference on a constant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 290102 g77-3.4
Bug#290102: g77-3.3: Please recompile with MXUNIT in fio.h increased to >= 1000
Bug reassigned from package `g77-3.3' to `g77-3.4'.
> # gfortran doesn't have a limit on units anymore
> retitle 290102 [fixed in 4.0] Please recomp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 244894 libstdc++6-4.0-dev
Bug#244894: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: const_reverse_iterators seem to be broken
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++5-3.3-dev' to `libstdc++6-4.0-dev'.
> retitle 244894 [C++ standard defect 280] const_reverse_iterators se
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 15:48:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#106866: [i386] useless jump to call instruction
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
No more hassle for your slow PC.
http://XIIcuvfLYJozvtvbif7wivcv4tacwb.solicsol8.com/?izqbkabeyjrlnvwm
Alexis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 228421 + upstream
Bug#228421: [fixed in 3.3] gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC
Tags were: fixed-upstream woody
Tags added: upstream
> reassign 273264 gcc
Bug#273264: Lacking documentation of mixing dynamic and static linking
Bug re
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 13:43:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line sarge will be gcc-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
tags 180486 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
is this still reproduceable? How about 3.4 or 4.0? Also, of course a
stand-alone testcase would be great, so we can further debug this...
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 180486 + moreinfo
Bug#180486: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 75269 gobjc-4.0
Bug#75269: [known limitation] Mangling in ObjC class and protocol names
Bug reassigned from package `gobjc' to `gobjc-4.0'.
> reassign 211586 g++-4.0
Bug#211586: [PR 13071] no way to exclude backward C++ headers from include pa
Increase your CUM VOLUME, and Orgasm Length
main benifits:
- The longest most intense Orgasms of your life
- Erctions like steel
- lncreased libido/desire
- Stronger ejaculaton (watch where your aiming)
- Multiple 0rgasms
- Up to 500% more volume (cover her in it if you want)
- Studies show it tast
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://russell.weightlossfirm.c
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 13:38:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#153478: Document refered to in info should be distrubuted
with package.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 248432 gcc-3.4
Bug#248432: [fixed in 3.5] [m68k] ICE in add_insn_before, at emit-rtl.c:3598
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `gcc-3.4'.
> retitle 248432 [fixed in 4.0] [m68k] ICE in add_insn_before, at
> emit-rtl.c:3598
Bug#248432: [f
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 13:08:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295326: gcc-3.3: Request the ability to write a static
library archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
tags 233208 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
there will most likely be an alternative implementation in 4.1:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01193.html
so I don't think we should add any external patches for now.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 233208 + wontfix
Bug#233208: Request for stack protector enabled by default
Tags were: upstream
Bug#213994: gcc-3.3: Please provide an overflow protection in the stock compiler
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-22 10:32 ---
Subject: Re: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, can you have a look?
Yup. Just woke up and many people are awaiting in the TO
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 12:16:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259196: libstdc++5: mixed signed/unsigned char comparison
in std::char_traits
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 09:32
---
Same for strt* and the other functions. Also we should remember to add to the
acinclude check for c99_stdlib the functions strtoll and strtoull, currently
missing.
(PS. In the meanwhile, done a minimal check that
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 09:15
---
Gaby, can you have a look? It seems to me that we should use the same approach
used in std_cmath.h for fpclassify & co. In particular, when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99
is defined - that explicitly checks for llabs and lldiv -
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-12
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild gcc-3.3 in sarge to track another bug and I got
a FTBFS on my normal system. I tried again in my buildd chroot and
there it works.
Comparing the build logs I found:
| DEB
53 matches
Mail list logo
