Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 20:29:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 09 13:29:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BMuv0-0008Hv-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 13:29:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 47B652B41BA
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  9 May 2004 22:29:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5767DEE.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.125.238])
        by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381BE2B425D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  9 May 2004 22:29:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id 7A7F1158AD5; Sun, 09 May 2004 22:28:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:28:59 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3.3-6

Some package fail to build on amd64 with this error:
/usr/include/c++/3.3/x86_64-linux/bits/atomicity.h:40: error: inconsistent
   operand constraints in an `asm'


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248207-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 12:20:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 05:20:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DZpRP-0001A4-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 05:20:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id ED66C19814E
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
        by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C0D198105
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id A00C326136; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:20:15 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This seems to have been fixed, so I'm closing this.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to