On June 17, 2003 at 6:44AM +0900,
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that xemacs21/*.elc files can be grouped into three types.
>
> (A) The package supports xemacs21*-mule* and xemacs21*-nomule*.
> *.elc can be shared between xemacs21*-mule* and xemacs21*-nomule*.
>
>
On June 18, 2003 at 5:48PM +0900,
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about using xemacs21-nomule flavor instead of xemacs21 flavor
> in the packages xemacs21-nomule and xemacs21-gnome-nomule?
Hmm... both of xemacs21-mule users and xemacs21-nomule users
should want to use xemacs21
On June 17, 2003 at 4:27PM -0400,
James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Have the xemacs mule binaries call emacsen-install with the value
>xemacs21-mule and use a dir /usr/share/xemacs21-mule/site-lisp.
> 2) Have the xemacs non-mule binaries call emacsen-install with the
>value x
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:44:02 +0900 (JST), Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Tatsuya> The packages mule-ucs, wl, t-gnus, and mhc are grouped into
Tatsuya> type-B.
Tatsuya> The packages mew and apel are grouped into type-C.
Tatsuya> What should be done about type-B and t
I found a problem that the mule-ucs package was not compiled when
xemacs21-nomule and xemacs21-mule were installed.
For instance,
* apt-get install emacs21 mule-ucs
mule-ucs was installed and compiled for emacs21.
* apt-get install xemacs21-nomule
mule-ucs was not compiled for xema
5 matches
Mail list logo
