>>>>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:44:02 +0900 (JST), Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
Tatsuya> The packages mule-ucs, wl, t-gnus, and mhc are grouped into Tatsuya> type-B. Tatsuya> The packages mew and apel are grouped into type-C. Tatsuya> What should be done about type-B and type-C? (xemacs21 Tatsuya> and/or emacsen-common be fixed?) Been thinking about this problem recently and it seems the best solution would be to do a couple of things: 1) Have the xemacs mule binaries call emacsen-install with the value xemacs21-mule and use a dir /usr/share/xemacs21-mule/site-lisp. 2) Have the xemacs non-mule binaries call emacsen-install with the value xemacs21-nomule and use a dir /usr/share/xemacs21-nomule/site-lisp. 3) Have both packages call emacsen-install with xemacs21 using /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp. Then those packages in their respective groups could compile for whichever set of the three is most appropriate. Comments? Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://people.debian.org/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
