Hi Michael,
Michael Albinus wrote:
> > I don't see any usefulness of keeping dbus support. Where do I need
> > that?
>
> The most important use of D-Bus in core Emacs are some Trmp methods
> (everything which needs GVFS), and some packages which use
> notifications-notify (erc-desktop-notificatio
Axel Beckert writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'm totally happy with all the other suggested parameters, especially
> with "--without-dbus". Having the possibility to have an emacs package
> without pulling dbus bloat in would be great.
>
>> I'm also wary about removing gpm, sound, and dbus. They seem
>> p
Hi,
I don't read debian-emacsen regularily, so this is probably a rather
late reply.
Rob Browning wrote:
> Jeffrey has suggested removing additional features from emacs-nox to
> make it smaller, and so I thought I'd raise the issue here to see what
> others think.
>
> cf. https://bugs.debian.org
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> To b clear, it does not matter on desktops and servers.
>
> The pain point (for me) is my BeagleBoard and CubieTruck.
Ahh, right -- small devices like that do support the idea of an
emacs-min
> They usually have 2GB or 4GB of storage, only have 750 MB or so after
> inst
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Jeffrey has suggested removing additional features from emacs-nox to
> make it smaller, and so I thought I'd raise the issue here to see what
> others think.
>
> cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828702
To b clear, it doe
Jeffrey has suggested removing additional features from emacs-nox to
make it smaller, and so I thought I'd raise the issue here to see what
others think.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828702
configure arguments proposed:
--with-xml2
--with-zlib
--without-x
--with
6 matches
Mail list logo
