Jeffrey has suggested removing additional features from emacs-nox to make it smaller, and so I thought I'd raise the issue here to see what others think.
cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828702 configure arguments proposed: --with-xml2 --with-zlib --without-x --without-sound --without-xpm --without-jpeg --without-tiff --without-gif --without-png --without-rsvg --without-imagemagick --without-xft --without-libotf --without-m17n-flt --without-xaw3d --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --without-gpm --without-dbus --without-gconf --without-gsettings In general, I'm inclined to keep most options that aren't specifically X related, since the package is "nox", but whether that should include png, etc. depends in part on how Emacs uses each subsystem. i.e. if --with-png isn't strictly for display, but say also allows Emacs/Elisp to gather information about png files, then we might want to keep it. I'm also wary about removing gpm, sound, and dbus. They seem potentially useful with or without X. If it turns out that there's enough difference between what we think is reasonable in an emacs24-nox packages and what we might want in a truly minimal package, then we could consider adding an emacs24-min or something, but such an addition should be weighed against the complexity it introduces. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
