Re: Handling of GNU free documentation licence in Debian

2006-09-13 Thread David Kastrup
Marco Cabizza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Il giorno mer, 13/09/2006 alle 13.23 +0200, Florent Rougon ha scritto: >> Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > package gnus-doc in non-free be an appropriate solution? GNU stuff in >> > non-free seems rather strange but would be funny anywa

Re: Handling of GNU free documentation licence in Debian

2006-09-13 Thread Marco Cabizza
Il giorno mer, 13/09/2006 alle 13.23 +0200, Florent Rougon ha scritto: > Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > package gnus-doc in non-free be an appropriate solution? GNU stuff in > > non-free seems rather strange but would be funny anyway. > > There is already a bunch of GNU software

Re: Handling of GNU free documentation licence in Debian

2006-09-13 Thread Florent Rougon
Elias Oltmanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > package gnus-doc in non-free be an appropriate solution? GNU stuff in > non-free seems rather strange but would be funny anyway. There is already a bunch of GNU software in non-free: - make-doc - texinfo-doc-nonfree - autoconf-doc - automake.*-

Handling of GNU free documentation licence in Debian

2006-09-12 Thread Elias Oltmanns
Hi all, currently, the gnus package in unstable is shipped without documentation because it's been released under the GNU free documentation licence and thus isn't compatible with Debian licencing, as I understand it. Emacs itself, however, is packaged including its documentation which is provided