Hello,
Thanks both. Xiyue, please merge the fix to master.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
"${SYMLINK}")".
Quotation resets inside $().
- "for file in ./*" not "for file in *"
per https://dwheeler.com/essays/filenames-in-shell.html sec. 1.2
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Now done on the emacs-30 branch.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es
> it by providing foo 1.1, will foo 1.0 automatically upgrade to Emacs
> A+deb12u1, or it still requires user manually uninstalling foo 1.0?)
No, and in fact the foo with the security hole would override the one
shipped with Emacs. We'd have to patch both packages.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
inspect
> `package--built-versions' directly. Not sure whether upstream would
> implement an API for querying built-package versions.
I think they probably would, if you'd like to ask about it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: notfixed -1 org-contrib/0.6-2
control: fixed -1 org-contrib/0.6-3
Thanks. I think I've fixed it in sid, now.
--
Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hello,
We're going to need more specifics about what doesn't work to be able to
do anything aobut this.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lse
> from the team wants to step in.
The ITS process is intended for the salvager to take over maintenance,
so it should be your name.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tup?
Is it because elpa-org ships a newer version?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
No, I'm afraid, we don't support this, and it's too close to the release
to try to work on it now.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
aded with dh-elpa <2.1.0.
Yeah, it's probably this one.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
specially given how Lisp
> in our elpa-* packages always overrides built-in versions of libraries.
> See <https://lists.debian.org/debian-emacsen/2025/02/msg00147.html>.
The only remaining rdep also has an RM bug filed. Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
since January 2022 and no-one has picked it up.
It is probably not a useful package to anyone because it has fallen way behind
upstream, which has since hit 1.0 (congrats to them!).
It is blocking the removal of seq-el (see #1098929).
So, please remove src:cider. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
t using a another library via :main-file. There are only two
>> packages taking advantage of that (tramp and matlab-mode), so for the
>> sake of these two packages, "package-build.el" and every alternative
>> package manager would have to support this too, for full compliance.
>
> I'd tend to agree.
>
--
Sean Whitton
) Unless
> anyone has any objections?
Nope, sounds good.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
package should
be removed in favour of the version shipped with Emacs. Development has
slowed down, and it is probably more of hindrance to users to have a
version out-of-sync with the version in Emacs itself, at this point.
The only remaining rdep also has an RM bug filed. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
in favour of the version shipped with Emacs. Development has
slowed down, and it is probably more of hindrance to users to have a
version out-of-sync with the version in Emacs itself, at this point.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
primarily targeted at fixing bookworm->trixie
partial upgrades. But they also fix the bookworm-backports situation.
> feel free to immediately upload emacs and dh-elpa as suggested.
Thanks for reviewing! Done, with dh-elpa now in backports-NEW.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat 08 Mar 2025 at 11:47am +01, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Am 6. März 2025 12:49:12 MEZ schrieb Sean Whitton :
>>I think I have the fix for these problems.
>>Updating the backport of Emacs to 1:30.1+1-4, and uploading an
>>NEW, unmodified backport of dh-el
on.
As the only thing for which we have hard evidence is that dh-elpa 2.1.7
works, I used that in the Breaks relation.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I think I have the fix for these problems.
Updating the backport of Emacs to 1:30.1+1-4, and uploading an
NEW, unmodified backport of dh-elpa 2.1.8, should be jointly sufficient.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Tue 04 Mar 2025 at 11:32pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello Xiyue,
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> What if we add a Breaks to Emacs in trixie saying it's incompatible with
>> dh-elpa-helper <<2.1.7 ?
>>
>> T
ts upgraded, and tries to bytecompile.
But a Breaks would mean dpkg would ensure the first two conditions are
never true.
Then we do indeed do a backport of dh-elpa to bookworm-backports so that
Emacs in backports remains installable.
No stable update needed.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descr
orts users.
For now I think Xiyue is just trying to understand the nature of the
breakage more fully so that we can address (1).
Stefan, are you suggesting something that would might fix (2), or were
you thinking of (3)?
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e issue.
So basically: we need analysis and investigation right now, not patches,
so far as I can tell.
Thanks for all your work so far. If you have the time to do more it
will be greatly appreciated.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
(>= 2.14))
> org-drill build depends on seq (no version), (despite the source file asking
> for seq (>= 2.14)), can be replaced by a build dependency on emacs-common (no
> version) (all emacs-common versions from buster provide seq (>= 2.14))
They only need a build-dep on emacs/emacs-
. No rdeps. The upstream repo is inactive; development now happens
in emacs.git. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dated. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
as discussed by mail
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpUe4Xl4phjt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
This is now in Emacs core in sid, and Xiyue intends to file an RC bug to keep
it out of trixie, so I think we should just REJECT it from NEW?
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Thu 27 Feb 2025 at 11:58pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> eglot, editorconfig, peg, faceup, IHNI.
>
> Forgot to mention: I packaged peg just for emacs-pg-el without knowing
> that it'll ship with Emacs 30.1. I thin
on of, in that case?
Really we want to be aiming to RM or keep in trixie. My "keep out of
trixie" bugs are meant to be a step towards removal.
It's not good for packages to disappear in one stable release and then
reappear in the next.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ere is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
> member of the ftpteam.
>
> If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.
>
> [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports
>
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Tue 25 Feb 2025 at 05:58pm +02, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Sean Whitton
>> Cc: emacs-de...@gnu.org, debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
>> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 09:17:37 +0800
>>
>> > Also, are you building the original release tarballs,
>>
ncy on this package and
rely on the version included with Emacs.
If you would really not like this to happen, please reply to that
message on the debian-emacsen list, CCing this bug, with your reasons.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
his package and
rely on the version included with Emacs.
If you would really not like this to happen, please reply to that
message on the debian-emacsen list, CCing this bug, with your reasons.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
necessary replacing them with emacs (>=1:30.1).
This bug is to kick seq-el out of testing, though we hope to just file
an RM bug soon.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it for a newer Emacs in order to get newer features in
these two libraries. GNU ELPA is already behind what's in Emacs 30.1 so
we'd be required to package a snapshot.
I'll file RC bugs to kick them out of testing and ask for objections to
filing RM bugs.
Org-mode
I assume we still want a separate package for this because it's such a
large thing of its own.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Tue 25 Feb 2025 at 10:57am GMT, Peter Oliver wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> The new Emacs 30.1 fails to build on all of Debian's 32-bit release
>> architectures, Intel and Arm.
>
> I’m not sure if this helps, but we don’t see thi
ty much just that, yes. (We do autotools reconf first.)
> By how much do you need to enlarge to make the builds succeed?
340->450 seems to do the trick, based on the error messages
asking for roughly 4.3MB.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon 24 Feb 2025 at 07:42pm +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> The new Emacs 30.1 fails to build on all of Debian's 32-bit release
> architectures, Intel and Arm.
>
> The failures look a little different in each case but in all three the
> string "Pure Lisp storage o
mp;ver=1%3A30.1%2B1-1&stamp=1740392697&raw=0
Any ideas?
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it would be nice to mention the origin.
Do you want to prepare a commit or shall I?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
know the sources
for the image.
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
don't think they generally need to be a member, no.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Mon 13 Jan 2025 at 05:14pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri 10 Jan 2025 at 02:34pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for bringing up this. I checked the uscan manual and it said
>&g
yeah, not so bad. Still more than HTTP.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
een told that the git mode is quite
> demanding of debian infrastructure resources.
>
> Nonetheless, I have no strong feelings about this, so I'll upload the package
> as soon as you merge to master and add the dch -r commit.
Yes, if we don't have to use mode=git then we
Hello,
On Fri 27 Dec 2024 at 01:20am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu 26 Dec 2024 at 03:23pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>
>>> Package: dh-make-elpa
>>> Version: 0.19.5
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>>
o
> suggests using "upstream/latest" as the branch name for upstream repo.
> I would like to suggest using "upstreamvcs" as upstream remote name
> instead, which is also used by dh-make.
I'd prefer to leave it as it is. The 'vcs' in 'upstreamvc
Hello,
LGTM, thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Thu 19 Dec 2024 at 10:20am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu 19 Dec 2024 at 03:04am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/dap-mode/-/merge_requests/2
>>
Hello,
On Thu 19 Dec 2024 at 03:04am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/dap-mode/-/merge_requests/2
Why did you add the emacs-lsp maintainers? Have they made changes?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e, like any other. Thus, d/copyright must
account for its license and copyright information, per Policy.
See: https://github.com/EthicalSource/contributor_covenant for the
license of this file, and you can figure out copyright holders,
including at least the original author Coraline Ada Ehm
Hello,
On Wed 18 Dec 2024 at 11:27pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Source: dap-mode
>> Version: 0.7-5
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5
>>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> Sor
Source: dap-mode
Version: 0.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5
Dear maintainer,
Sorry I missed this during RFS review, but d/copyright is wrong
regarding CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, which has its own license and copyright.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP
you can patch it to something compatible.
--
Sean Whitton
etc. version numbers defined.
>> See `version-to-list'. Maybe dh_elpa could append a tilde in the
>> presence of one of those.
>>
>
> I'm not sure this will help with the dap-mode/emacs-lsp-docker
> situation, as the current Package-Version of emacs-lsp-docke
`version-to-list'. Maybe dh_elpa could append a tilde in the
presence of one of those.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sun 08 Dec 2024 at 11:27pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun 08 Dec 2024 at 05:02pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>
>>> Package: dh-elpa
>>> Version: 2.1.5
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>&g
dh_elpa too clever, we should just add a
patch in debian/patches to fix the Package-Version header.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Thanks!
--
Sean Whitton
e diff can be found at
> [1]. Note that this fix does not require an archive rebuild.
I think this is fine. Go ahead and apply, if you've tested it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Sun 20 Oct 2024 at 02:56am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Please feel free to upload. Thanks!
Done, though unfortunately I had to make a commit to fix the
permissions of d/rules; dgit was complaining about the inconsistency.
(It's 755 in the built source package.)
--
Sean
Hello,
I rewrote a sentence in README.Debian for clarity. Let me know when you
want me to upload this to NEW. Maybe you'd like to commit the 'dch -r'
commit in this case.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
sion number of '1' and just increment it each
time we update? (I don't mind if you do want to use 0.1.)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Thu 17 Oct 2024 at 10:22pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Reusing the emacs-goodies-el source package just seemed convenient.
>> Making a separate source package is fine with me. Xiyue?
>>
>
> Ack. Let me ma
Hello,
Reusing the emacs-goodies-el source package just seemed convenient.
Making a separate source package is fine with me. Xiyue?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
gt; for now and try to making it more flexible for now. Wdyt? Would also be
> great to hear from more people.
It's a transition package, so this is expected.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
control: tag -1 + pending
Hello,
On Wed 16 Oct 2024 at 10:45pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Maybe calling it emacs-editing-major-modes? I have removed the tooling
> major modes[1] in the new patch. PTAL.
LGTM, let me know when you want me to sponsor an upload to binNEW.
--
Sean W
des? What do you think?
--
Sean Whitton
should be all of them, because then it's a no-brainer
to just install it.
I noticed in your patch that the Description needs updating.
I suggest you write that it is intended to recommend all and only Emacs
major modes available in Debian, and any missing from the list
constitute
ends. I think this is the most useful metapackage we
could provide.
Do you have thoughts on this? Are you keener on how it is now?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ey're much more
specialised, and you're unlikely to want to use them without adding
configuration to your init.el, in which case why not just install them
individually?
Also, it might be that the list of packages falls out-of-date over time,
as trends evolve. Whereas a way to install all the major mode supported
in Debian wouldn't ever stop being useful.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
I would probably install this. How about calling it emacs-major-modes
though?
--
Sean Whitton
jor modes" is something people would
want, and "give me a random selection of Emacs addons" or even "give me
all the Emacs addons" are not.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Tue 01 Oct 2024 at 06:28pm +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would probably install this. How about calling it emacs-major-modes
> though?
We could even add it to Suggests: for emacs.
--
Sean Whitton
lsa ci helpful for working on dgit, but that's because we're
the upstream. I'm sceptical of how useful it might be for Emacs addons
we're packaging.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Thu 12 Sep 2024 at 12:42pm +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > I hope that this alleviates your concerns about the autoremoval method
>> > and lets us focus on the suggested remova
n uploads to update metadata, to save you some work.)
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This was a half-written draft that I did not intend to send. Apologies.
On Thu 05 Sep 2024 at 03:37pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote:
> That's simply not what the serious notification means.
>
> Also, this package has no maintainer: #
--
Sean Whitton
; that should be kept. Do you think that severity serious is the wrong
> tool for this job? If not, can you suggest a better way of justifying
> it?
That's simply not what the serious notification means.
Also, this package has no maintainer: #
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Thu 05 Sep 2024 at 03:53pm +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I know that downgrading the bug will cancel the reassignment. That is a
>> side-effect of my downgrade. I am just setting it to w
setting it to what I think is
the correct severity. Correct severities in the BTS matter to me.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
than electric-indent-mode.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tries are ephemeral. I should have said this
earlier.
I wish we had better tools in this area so that upset could be avoided.
--
Sean Whitton
gt; increase your workload. Just please do the bare minimum (add remote,
> pull, and push) and create a list that requires further action.
I see what you mean. I'll consider that next time, thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Xiyue,
On Thu 25 Jul 2024 at 11:54pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> I have prepared a patch at [3] and also attached. Please help review
> and comment. I'll merge it once it's approved.
Please don't merge this yourself; let me or David do it. Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Fri 26 Jul 2024 at 12:41pm +09, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed 24 Jul 2024 at 08:15pm +09, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> I am about to do no-change uploads of every addon package to rebuild
>> them against dh-elpa 2.1.3.
>>
>> I will do this us
Hello,
On Wed 24 Jul 2024 at 08:15pm +09, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I am about to do no-change uploads of every addon package to rebuild
> them against dh-elpa 2.1.3.
>
> I will do this using 'dgit clone' and then 'dgit push-source'.
> This is because I don't
hed to salsa, but not uploaded.
When you next upload any package, please pull in my d/changelog entry.
'dgit pull' for a patches-applied workflow or there are no patches, else
you'll need to manually merge it in; feel free to ask me for help.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
On Tue 23 Jul 2024 at 08:18pm -05, Rob Browning wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> We noticed that the triggers spec[0] says "It is not defined in what
>> order triggers will run." We think this may invalidate your current
>> approach. Or did you a
e this and account for it?
Thanks.
[0] /usr/share/doc/dpkg/spec/triggers.txt
--
Sean Whitton
Hello,
On Thu 11 Jul 2024 at 03:14pm +02, Aymeric Agon-Rambosson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le jeudi 11 juillet 2024 à 08:09, Sean Whitton a
> écrit :
>
>> If you were going to make complex edits you would always fix it in the
>> .org and regenerate the .texi, right?
>
have all
files in their preferred form for modification, and this bug becomes RC.
--
Sean Whitton
> modification, I could also solve the .texi regeneration bug, but only
> later(TM).
We don't have to make a declaration: we have to determine the truth.
If you were going to make complex edits you would always fix it in the
.org and regenerate the .texi, right? You wouldn't manually e
Hello,
On Wed 10 Jul 2024 at 02:38am +02, Aymeric Agon-Rambosson wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Le mardi 9 juillet 2024 à 21:56, Sean Whitton a
> écrit :
>
>> If we don't rebuild the docs, it's hard to be confident that it *can* be
>> rebuilt with only tools in m
Hello Aymeric,
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:35:07PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Changes:
> org-roam (2.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Adopt the package from Sean Whitton.
>* Bump standards version to 4.6.2 (no changes required).
>* Stop rebuilding
Hello,
Sorry to keep asking for these minor changes, but it does help me
understand the change better.
Why can't you just use debian/install to install the .nosearch? Are you
trying to avoid creating an empty .nosearch in the source package, or is
there some other reason?
--
Sean Whitton
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
