Re: Re Re Xemacs needs help

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:33:49 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it >>> violat

Re: Re Xemacs needs help

Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:33:49PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: >> All I'm trying to say is that if Emacs CVS snapshots are uploaded to >> unstable, it should be done with the intention of releasing it in a >> stable Debian

Re: Re Xemacs needs help

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:41:45 -0800, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> JÃrÃme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Quoting Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>&

Re: Xemacs needs help

Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > RC bugs prevent packages to enter testing. >> >> And that's an ugly kludge that should be used minimally and only >> temporarily (again IMO). > > Huh?

Re: Xemacs needs help

Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoting Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS snapshots. >> > What distribution do you think it would fit the best?: >> > - unstable >> &g

Re: Xemacs needs help

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:36:26PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: >>> Very true, I mentioned some oddies and also propose to sync with offical >>> xemacs release politics, ie stable should be 21.4.x and testing 21.5