[EMAIL PROTECTED] (J閞鬽e Marant) writes: > Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:36:26PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: >>> Very true, I mentioned some oddies and also propose to sync with offical >>> xemacs release politics, ie stable should be 21.4.x and testing 21.5.x. >> >> I don't use xemacs, but that doesn't make much sense -- you can't choose >> different versions for stable/testing like that (and even if some override >> mechanism exists, there seems no good reason to do so in this case). You >> just put whatever version seems a good choice into unstable, and if it's >> bug-free enough, it'll become the version in testing, and thence at some >> point the version in stable. > > BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS snapshots. > What distribution do you think it would fit the best?: > - unstable > - experimental > - none of the above, a stagging area would be better
Keep in mind that anything uploaded to unstable really should be fit for a stable Debian release (IMO anyway). -- Don't worry, it's *in*-flammable.
