Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> [...] For example, GFDL-hostile entities like Debian will
>> be free to distribute the material GPL-only, meaning that
>> it will become impossible to reasonably create
>> printed copies.
>
> It is impossi
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...] For example, GFDL-hostile entities like Debian will
> be free to distribute the material GPL-only, meaning that
> it will become impossible to reasonably create
> printed copies.
It is impossible to reasonably create printed copies
of GPLed manual
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:35:19 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Huh? Are you saying that it's OK to publish some random manual,
>>> and state on the cover that it is "A GNU Manual", when it is,
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:09:49 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:34:13 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>>
>>> If I were in the position of a Debian maintainer (which I am not),
>>> I would consi
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:24:30 +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this *
software must display the following acknowledgment:
>>>
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:24:30 +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this *
>>> software must display the following acknowledgment:
>>
>> This does not place any conditions on the d
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:35:19 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Huh? Are you saying that it's OK to publish some random manual, and
>> state on the cover that it is "A GNU Manual", when it is, in fact,
>> NOT a GNU manual? Is the FSF OK wi
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:25:52 +0300, Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> В Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:41:05 -0400, Hubert Chan написа:
>> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:54:05 +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>>> I believe the license clause is annoying, but, as for OpenSSL, does
>>> not m
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:34:13 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> If I were in the position of a Debian maintainer (which I am not), I
>> would consider GFDLed documentation with the standard GNU project
>> cover texts in their _curren
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:34:13 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If I were in the position of a Debian maintainer (which I am not), I
> would consider GFDLed documentation with the standard GNU project
> cover texts in their _current_ form sufficient for inclusion into
> main as long
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
>> * software must display the following acknowledgment:
>
> This does not place any conditions on the distribution or modification
> of the work itself. It only places conditions on aux
Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note that during the last GFDL discussion on -vote (prior to the GR)
> Anton Zinoviev and I contacted RMS about some clarifications. He
> believes that a manual might be non-free for someone, if it contains
> a long enough list with lots of invariant se
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 09:16:59 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:09:15 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:54:05 +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> I believe the license clause is annoying, but, as for OpenSSL, does
>> not make it impossible to use the licensed material freely, and in
>> particular, should not pre
В Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:41:05 -0400, Hubert Chan написа:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:54:05 +0200, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I believe the license clause is annoying, but, as for OpenSSL, does
>> not make it impossible to use the licensed material freely, and in
>> particular, should
15 matches
Mail list logo
