Re: Status of x-symbol?

Marcus Frings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > does anyone know about the maintainer of x-symbol? The package is > heavily outdated and there are some open bug reports (with many > unanswered by Steve Dunham). > > I would be very glad to see a version in Debian that's in sync with the > up

Status of x-symbol?

Hello, does anyone know about the maintainer of x-symbol? The package is heavily outdated and there are some open bug reports (with many unanswered by Steve Dunham). I would be very glad to see a version in Debian that's in sync with the upstream release. Regards, Marcus -- "I had a face on the

Re: acpi parts of battery.el

"Brian P. Flaherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just to let people know, it was my mis-understanding of what > display-battery was showing, not a problem with battery.el. It is > showing approximately 80% because that appears to be the current full > capacity relative to the design capacity. >

Re: acpi parts of battery.el

Just to let people know, it was my mis-understanding of what display-battery was showing, not a problem with battery.el. It is showing approximately 80% because that appears to be the current full capacity relative to the design capacity. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc/acpi/battery/BAT0$ cat info pre