I love to do it in
Dallas..
Boo :)))
Cialisr (Regalis4), at cheap prices.Most zones charge $20, we charge $4.95.
Quite a diffference.CialisK is knnown as a Super ViagraE or Weekend
Viagrat
because its efetcfs start seoonr and last much logner.Shipped
worldwide.Your easy-to-use solution is here: http://www.medz4cheap.co
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Auctex: xemacs loads the auctex package for emacs21! That
>is having (require 'tex-site) in the init file and doing
>locate-library, points out to the gnu emacs directory.
You mean /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/tex-site.el? On Debian,
/usr/share
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:53:58 +, Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
debian-emacsen:
> - The 21.5 series in another thing, this is still
> buggy (official beta) so why not putting it into the
> testing branch of debian.
Because that will put it in Debia
Quoting Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - The 21.5 series in another thing, this is still
> buggy (official beta) so why not putting it into the
> testing branch of debian.
I guess you don't mean 'testing' but 'experimental'. 'testing'
is the release candidate
Quoting Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS snapshots.
> > What distribution do you think it would fit the best?:
> > - unstable
> > - experimental
> > - none of the above, a stagging area would be better
>
> Keep in mind that anythin
On 27 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:06:23 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Nathanael Nerode) said:
>
> Nathanael> The maintainer, James Lewis-Moss, appears to be too busy
> Nathanael> (or something) to maintain the xemacs packages properly
> Nathanael> at the moment.
On 26 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:36:26PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> Very true, I mentioned some oddies and also propose to sync with
>> offical xemacs release politics, ie stable should be 21.4.x and
>> testing 21.5.x.
>
> I don't use xemacs, but that doesn't
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Keep in mind that anything uploaded to unstable really should be fit for
> a stable Debian release (IMO anyway).
This is generally true of CVS emacs anyway -- it's very rare for there
to be significant problems, and potentially destabilizing changes are
g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:36:26PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>> Very true, I mentioned some oddies and also propose to sync with offical
>>> xemacs release politics, ie stable should be 21.4.x and testing 21.5
10 matches
Mail list logo
